Pimpimon Tansakul
- Molecular Biology
- Plant Science top 10%
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Complementary and alternative medicine top 5%
- Food Science
- Co-authors
- Supinya TewtrakulMasaaki ShibuyaYutaka EbizukaTetsuo KushiroChutha Sae‐WongPharkphoom PanichayupakaranantSeikou NakamuraHisashi Matsuda
- Topics
- Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (6 papers)Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (5 papers)Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaFEBS LettersJournal of Ethnopharmacology
- Partner nations
- ThailandJapanNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Pimpimon Tansakul
19 papers receiving 696 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Molecular Biology 460
- Plant Science 230
- Pharmacology 222
- Complementary and alternative medicine 91
- Food Science 65
Countries citing papers authored by Pimpimon Tansakul
This map shows the geographic impact of Pimpimon Tansakul's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pimpimon Tansakul with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pimpimon Tansakul more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pimpimon Tansakul
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pimpimon Tansakul. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pimpimon Tansakul. The network helps show where Pimpimon Tansakul may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pimpimon Tansakul
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pimpimon Tansakul. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pimpimon Tansakul based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pimpimon Tansakul. Pimpimon Tansakul is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 30 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 95 | |
| 9 | 47 | |
| 10 | 27 | |
| 11 | 30 | |
| 12 | 87 | |
| 13 | 33 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 59 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 79 | |
| 18 | 176 | |
| 19 | 16 |
About Pimpimon Tansakul
Pimpimon Tansakul is a scholar working on Toxicology, Complementary and alternative medicine and Molecular Medicine, having authored 19 papers that have together received 714 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (6 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (5 papers) and Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (222 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (91 citations) and Toxicology (37 citations). Pimpimon Tansakul has collaborated with scholars based in Thailand, Japan and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Supinya Tewtrakul, Masaaki Shibuya, Yutaka Ebizuka, Tetsuo Kushiro, Chutha Sae‐Wong, Pharkphoom Panichayupakaranant, Seikou Nakamura, Hisashi Matsuda, Chatchanok Karalai and Yukiko Nomura. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, FEBS Letters and Journal of Ethnopharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.