Pietro Calice
- Finance top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Accounting top 5%
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 10%
- Management Science and Operations Research
- Co-authors
- Leone LeonidaGiovanni CaggianoThouraya TrikiGeorge KapetaniosNan ZhouNepomuk DunzDimitri G. DemekasStephany Griffith‐Jones
- Topics
- Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (15 papers)Global Financial Crisis and Policies (7 papers)Islamic Finance and Banking Studies (6 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Banking & FinanceJournal of Empirical FinanceResearch in International Business and Finance
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Pietro Calice
26 papers receiving 259 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- Finance 203
- Economics and Econometrics 142
- Accounting 125
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 44
- Management Science and Operations Research 32
Countries citing papers authored by Pietro Calice
This map shows the geographic impact of Pietro Calice's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pietro Calice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pietro Calice more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pietro Calice
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pietro Calice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pietro Calice. The network helps show where Pietro Calice may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pietro Calice
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pietro Calice. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pietro Calice based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pietro Calice. Pietro Calice is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 35 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | Simplified enterprise survey and private sector mapping : Libya 2015 | 1 |
| 16 | Improving the quality of financial intermediation in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Countries | 7 |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 82 | |
| 19 | African Development Finance Institutions: Unlocking the Potential | 1 |
| 20 | 1 |
About Pietro Calice
Pietro Calice is a scholar working on Finance, Accounting and Development, having authored 28 papers that have together received 289 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (15 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (7 papers) and Islamic Finance and Banking Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Finance (203 citations), Accounting (125 citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (44 citations). Pietro Calice has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Leone Leonida, Giovanni Caggiano, Thouraya Triki, George Kapetanios, Nan Zhou, Nepomuk Dunz, Dimitri G. Demekas, Stephany Griffith‐Jones, Ata Can Bertay and Eduardo Pontual Ribeiro. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Banking & Finance, Journal of Empirical Finance and Research in International Business and Finance.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.