Piet de Goede

1.3k total citations
8 papers, 964 citations indexed

About

Piet de Goede is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Developmental Biology and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Piet de Goede has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 964 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 4 papers in Developmental Biology and 3 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Piet de Goede's work include Animal Behavior and Reproduction (8 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (4 papers) and Plant and animal studies (3 papers). Piet de Goede is often cited by papers focused on Animal Behavior and Reproduction (8 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (4 papers) and Plant and animal studies (3 papers). Piet de Goede collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, New Zealand and France. Piet de Goede's co-authors include Kees van Oers, Piet J. Drent, Niels J. Dingemanse, Arie J. van Noordwijk, Marc Naguib, P.R. Wiepkema, Philipp Sprau, Mathieu Amy, Michaela Hau and Sonja V. Schaper and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Animal Behaviour.

In The Last Decade

Piet de Goede

8 papers receiving 940 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Piet de Goede Netherlands	8	835	448	242	164	129	8	964
John C. Wingfield United States	10	855 1.0×	558 1.2×	175 0.7×	142 0.9×	105 0.8×	11	1.1k
Thijs van Overveld Belgium	16	773 0.9×	572 1.3×	129 0.5×	116 0.7×	96 0.7×	25	989
Ingrid Schwabl Germany	20	856 1.0×	736 1.6×	166 0.7×	87 0.5×	199 1.5×	27	1.2k
Claudia Mettke‐Hofmann United Kingdom	16	483 0.6×	386 0.9×	123 0.5×	241 1.5×	100 0.8×	28	837
Ella F. Cole United Kingdom	9	690 0.8×	339 0.8×	168 0.7×	255 1.6×	122 0.9×	12	831
Amélie N. Dreiss Switzerland	19	833 1.0×	523 1.2×	236 1.0×	130 0.8×	94 0.7×	45	1.1k
P.J. Drent Netherlands	12	1.2k 1.4×	539 1.2×	195 0.8×	259 1.6×	166 1.3×	12	1.4k
Ella F. Cole United Kingdom	18	922 1.1×	548 1.2×	243 1.0×	342 2.1×	185 1.4×	31	1.4k
Thomas Van’t Hof Germany	9	512 0.6×	448 1.0×	198 0.8×	94 0.6×	70 0.5×	11	787
Tom P. Flower South Africa	14	562 0.7×	401 0.9×	157 0.6×	150 0.9×	59 0.5×	21	757

Countries citing papers authored by Piet de Goede

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Piet de Goede's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Piet de Goede with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Piet de Goede more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Piet de Goede

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Piet de Goede. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Piet de Goede. The network helps show where Piet de Goede may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Piet de Goede

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Piet de Goede. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Piet de Goede based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Piet de Goede. Piet de Goede is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Snijders, Lysanne, et al.. (2016). Context‐dependent effects of radio transmitter attachment on a small passerine. Journal of Avian Biology. 48(5). 650–659. 19 indexed citations

2.

Snijders, Lysanne, et al.. (2015). Song Trait Similarity in Great Tits Varies with Social Structure. PLoS ONE. 10(2). e0116881–e0116881. 19 indexed citations

3.

Naguib, Marc, et al.. (2013). Noise annoys: effects of noise on breeding great tits depend on personality but not on noise characteristics. Animal Behaviour. 85(5). 949–956. 47 indexed citations

4.

Baugh, Alexander T., Sonja V. Schaper, Michaela Hau, et al.. (2011). Corticosterone responses differ between lines of great tits (Parus major) selected for divergent personalities. General and Comparative Endocrinology. 175(3). 488–494. 99 indexed citations

5.

Amy, Mathieu, Philipp Sprau, Piet de Goede, & Marc Naguib. (2010). Effects of personality on territory defence in communication networks: a playback experiment with radio-tagged great tits. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 277(1700). 3685–3692. 82 indexed citations

6.

Oers, Kees van, Piet J. Drent, Piet de Goede, & Arie J. van Noordwijk. (2004). Realized heritability and repeatability of risk-taking behaviour in relation to avian personalities. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 271(1534). 65–73. 352 indexed citations

7.

Dingemanse, Niels J. & Piet de Goede. (2004). The relation between dominance and exploratory behavior is context-dependent in wild great tits. Behavioral Ecology. 15(6). 1023–1030. 225 indexed citations

8.

Goede, Piet de, et al.. (1999). INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOURAL CHARACTERISTICS AND DOMINANCE IN AVIARY GROUPS OF GREAT TITS. Behaviour. 136(1). 23–48. 121 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact