Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Food security and sustainability: can one exist without the other?
2015276 citationsElliot M. Berry, S. Dernini et al.Public Health Nutritionprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Piero Conforti
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Piero Conforti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Piero Conforti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Piero Conforti more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Piero Conforti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Piero Conforti. The network helps show where Piero Conforti may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Piero Conforti
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Piero Conforti.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Piero Conforti based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Piero Conforti. Piero Conforti is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Berry, Elliot M., S. Dernini, Barbara Burlingame, A. Meybeck, & Piero Conforti. (2015). Food security and sustainability: can one exist without the other?. Public Health Nutrition. 18(13). 2293–2302.276 indexed citations breakdown →
Conforti, Piero. (2011). Looking ahead in world food and agriculture : perspectives to 2050.123 indexed citations
8.
Alexandratos, N. & Piero Conforti. (2011). World food and agriculture to 2030/2050 revisited. Highlights and views four years later.. 11–56.5 indexed citations
Conforti, Piero, et al.. (2007). Trade and food security policy analysis: a practical guide.. 289–339.2 indexed citations
11.
Conforti, Piero, et al.. (2007). Agricultural trade policy and food security in the Caribbean: structural issues, multilateral negotiations and competitiveness..14 indexed citations
12.
Conforti, Piero, et al.. (2007). Addressing trade preferences and their erosion in the Caribbean.. 107–121.
13.
Conforti, Piero, et al.. (2007). Sugar trade in the Caribbean.. 177–189.1 indexed citations
14.
Sarris, A., Piero Conforti, Amresh Prakash, & D. Hallam. (2006). The use of futures and options to insure wheat import price risks by low-income food deficit countries.. 304–355.3 indexed citations
15.
Antimiani, Alessandro, Piero Conforti, & Luca Salvatici. (2005). Alternative Scenarios and Strategic Interactions Between Developed and Developing Countries in the Agricultural Trade Negotiations of the Doha Round: A Reappraisal. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA).4 indexed citations
Conforti, Piero & Luca Salvatici. (2004). Agricultural Trade Liberalization in the Doha Round. Alternative Scenarios and Strategic Interactions between Developed and Developing countries. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA).12 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.