Phoebe S.‐H. Neo

475 citations
13 papers · 279 indexed · h-index 7
Topics
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers)EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (5 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers)
Journals
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Affective DisordersHippocampus
Partner nations
New Zealand

In The Last Decade

Phoebe S.‐H. Neo

13 papers receiving 274 citations

Peers

Phoebe S.‐H. Neo
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 197
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 123
  • Clinical Psychology 44
  • Neurology 34
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 32
Replace Alexia Bourgeois with:
Alexia Bourgeois Switzerland
Lina Skora United Kingdom
Briana L. Kennedy Australia
Verena N. Buchholz Germany
Artyom Zinchenko Germany
Inês Almeida Portugal
Ben M. Crittenden United Kingdom
Seppo J. Laukka Finland
Michał Kuniecki Poland
Lisa N. Jefferies Canada
Phoebe S.‐H. Neo relative to Alexia Bourgeois Switzerland Alexia Bourgeois's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Alexia Bourgeois · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phoebe S.‐H. Neo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phoebe S.‐H. Neo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phoebe S.‐H. Neo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phoebe S.‐H. Neo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phoebe S.‐H. Neo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phoebe S.‐H. Neo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phoebe S.‐H. Neo. The network helps show where Phoebe S.‐H. Neo may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Phoebe S.‐H. Neo

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Phoebe S.‐H. Neo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Phoebe S.‐H. Neo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Phoebe S.‐H. Neo. Phoebe S.‐H. Neo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 3
2 1
3 2
4 6
5 3
6 11
7 6
8 65
9 27
10 49
11 27
12 48
13 31

About Phoebe S.‐H. Neo

Phoebe S.‐H. Neo is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience and General Decision Sciences, having authored 13 papers that have together received 279 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (5 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (197 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (123 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (27 citations). Phoebe S.‐H. Neo has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Neil McNaughton, Brendan McCane, Paul Glue, Shabah M. Shadli, Cynthia L. Darlington, Julia A. McIntosh, Yiwen Zheng, Paul F. Smith, Martin Sellbom and Xiping Fu. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Affective Disorders and Hippocampus.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026