Phoebe E. McKenna-Plumley
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Health top 2%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jenny M. GroarkeLisa Graham‐WisenerEmma BerryChérie ArmourEmily McGlincheyRhiannon N. TurnerTeresa FarroniKeming Yang
- Topics
- Health disparities and outcomes (10 papers)COVID-19 and Mental Health (4 papers)Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIrelandItaly
In The Last Decade
Phoebe E. McKenna-Plumley
15 papers receiving 806 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Clinical Psychology 440
- Social Psychology 303
- Health 284
- General Health Professions 140
- Sociology and Political Science 115
Countries citing papers authored by Phoebe E. McKenna-Plumley
This map shows the geographic impact of Phoebe E. McKenna-Plumley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phoebe E. McKenna-Plumley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phoebe E. McKenna-Plumley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Phoebe E. McKenna-Plumley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phoebe E. McKenna-Plumley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phoebe E. McKenna-Plumley. The network helps show where Phoebe E. McKenna-Plumley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Phoebe E. McKenna-Plumley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Phoebe E. McKenna-Plumley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Phoebe E. McKenna-Plumley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Phoebe E. McKenna-Plumley. Phoebe E. McKenna-Plumley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 23 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 36 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 61 | |
| 12 | Loneliness in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional results from the COVID-19 Psychological Wellbeing Studybreakdown → | 533 |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 30 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | Factors Influencing the Application of a Biopsychosocial Perspective in Clinical Judgement of Chronic Pain: Interactive Management with Medical Students. | 10 |
| 18 | 58 |
About Phoebe E. McKenna-Plumley
Phoebe E. McKenna-Plumley is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Health and Family Practice, having authored 18 papers that have together received 827 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health disparities and outcomes (10 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (4 papers) and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (284 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (36 citations) and Clinical Psychology (440 citations). Phoebe E. McKenna-Plumley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Jenny M. Groarke, Lisa Graham‐Wisener, Emma Berry, Chérie Armour, Emily McGlinchey, Rhiannon N. Turner, Teresa Farroni, Keming Yang, Ronan Conway and Michael Hogan. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Social Science & Medicine and Journal of Affective Disorders.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.