Emma Berry

27 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Emma Berry's Hit Papers

Loneliness in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional results from the COVID-19 Psychological Wellbeing Study 2020 · 541 citations
5410+2+4Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

Emma Berry
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Health 239
  • Clinical Psychology 385
  • Applied Psychology 56
  • Social Psychology 205
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 10
Replace Liu Liu with:
Liu Liu China
Ashley Hagaman United States
Ryan P. Scott United States
Heather L. Gainforth Canada
Bárbara Luque Spain
Jarron M. Saint Onge United States
Pernille Tanggaard Andersen Denmark
Adel F. Almutairi Saudi Arabia
Lorna Hobbs United Kingdom
Ghazala Mir United Kingdom
Emma Berry relative to Liu Liu China Liu Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Liu Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Berry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Berry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Berry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Berry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Berry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Berry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Berry. The network helps show where Emma Berry may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Berry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Berry Line = papers co-authored together Emma Berry links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Loneliness in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional results from the COVID-19 Psychological Wellbeing Study
Hit paper breakdown →
2020541
2 201573
3 202065
4 202163
5 202159
6 202138
7 202136
8 201728
9 202126
10 202221
11 202218
12 201718
13 202317
14 20228
15 20237
16 20196
17 20235
18 20185
19 20234
20 20242

About Emma Berry

Emma Berry is a scholar working on Health, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Epidemiology and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diabetes Management and Education (4 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (4 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (4 papers), Microplastics and Plastic Pollution (3 papers), Municipal Solid Waste Management (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers), Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability (2 papers) and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (239 citations), Clinical Psychology (385 citations), Applied Psychology (56 citations), Social Psychology (205 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (10 citations). Emma Berry has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Bangladesh. Frequent co-authors include Emily McGlinchey, Chérie Armour, Lisa Graham‐Wisener, Jenny M. Groarke, Phoebe E. McKenna-Plumley, Martin Dempster, Mark Davies, Sarah Butter, Deborah Roy and Sam Lockhart. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, British Journal of Health Psychology, BMC Public Health, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth and International Journal of Adolescence and Youth.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact