Phoebe E. Bailey

3.0k total citations
63 papers, 2.1k citations indexed

About

Phoebe E. Bailey is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Phoebe E. Bailey has authored 63 papers receiving a total of 2.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 22 papers in Social Psychology and 21 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Phoebe E. Bailey's work include Aging and Gerontology Research (20 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (8 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (8 papers). Phoebe E. Bailey is often cited by papers focused on Aging and Gerontology Research (20 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (8 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (8 papers). Phoebe E. Bailey collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Phoebe E. Bailey's co-authors include Julie D. Henry, Ted Ruffman, Peter G. Rendell, Louise H. Phillips, William von Hippel, Ian Kneebone, Matthias Kliegel, Brooke Brady, Kandice J. Varcin and Mareike Altgassen and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Developmental Psychology and Computers in Human Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Phoebe E. Bailey

58 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Phoebe E. Bailey Australia 26 812 684 663 586 416 63 2.1k
Daniel Grühn United States 20 552 0.7× 584 0.9× 891 1.3× 270 0.5× 416 1.0× 34 2.0k
Nicola Mammarella Italy 23 1.0k 1.2× 597 0.9× 496 0.7× 222 0.4× 262 0.6× 104 2.0k
Dorthe Kirkegaard Thomsen Denmark 27 578 0.7× 801 1.2× 596 0.9× 151 0.3× 830 2.0× 81 2.6k
Serena Lecce Italy 27 578 0.7× 483 0.7× 849 1.3× 147 0.3× 633 1.5× 90 2.2k
Robert W. Levenson United States 6 638 0.8× 1.2k 1.7× 1.6k 2.4× 358 0.6× 1.4k 3.4× 7 3.4k
James Williams United Kingdom 18 817 1.0× 777 1.1× 362 0.5× 367 0.6× 988 2.4× 22 2.6k
Luis F. Garcı́a Spain 30 178 0.2× 839 1.2× 804 1.2× 242 0.4× 1.3k 3.1× 101 2.5k
Amanda J. Barnier Australia 29 2.2k 2.7× 528 0.8× 669 1.0× 488 0.8× 377 0.9× 117 3.0k
Heather C. Lench United States 26 865 1.1× 741 1.1× 852 1.3× 102 0.2× 653 1.6× 63 2.6k
Lia Kvavilashvili United Kingdom 29 1.7k 2.1× 1.9k 2.8× 204 0.3× 988 1.7× 230 0.6× 59 2.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Phoebe E. Bailey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phoebe E. Bailey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phoebe E. Bailey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phoebe E. Bailey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phoebe E. Bailey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phoebe E. Bailey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phoebe E. Bailey. The network helps show where Phoebe E. Bailey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Phoebe E. Bailey

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Phoebe E. Bailey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Phoebe E. Bailey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Phoebe E. Bailey. Phoebe E. Bailey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Weidemann, Gabrielle, et al.. (2025). Age, Anger, and Gratitude: An Online Emotion Induction to Assess Advice-Taking in Older Age. Research on Aging. 48(2). 158–168.
3.
Weidemann, Gabrielle, et al.. (2024). Cognitive and Emotional Factors Influencing the Incorporation of Advice Into Decision Making Across the Adult Lifespan. The Journals of Gerontology Series B. 79(7). 1 indexed citations
4.
Varcin, Kandice J., Sarah A. Grainger, Phoebe E. Bailey, Jenny L. Richmond, & Julie D. Henry. (2019). Empathy for others’ pain is disrupted at the neurophysiological level in schizophrenia. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 58(4). 406–426. 4 indexed citations
5.
Bailey, Phoebe E., et al.. (2019). A systematic review and meta-analysis of age-related differences in trust.. Psychology and Aging. 34(5). 674–685. 41 indexed citations
6.
Smith, Evelyn, et al.. (2018). The effect of attentional bias modification training on food intake in overweight and obese women. Journal of Health Psychology. 25(10-11). 1511–1521. 15 indexed citations
7.
Rendell, Peter G., et al.. (2017). Music to my ears: Age-related decline in musical and facial emotion recognition.. Psychology and Aging. 32(8). 698–709. 14 indexed citations
8.
Terrett, Gill, et al.. (2016). Deconstructing the nature of episodic foresight deficits associated with chronic opiate use. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 55(4). 401–413. 15 indexed citations
9.
Bailey, Phoebe E., Gillian Slessor, Matthias Rieger, et al.. (2015). Trust and trustworthiness in young and older adults.. Psychology and Aging. 30(4). 977–986. 41 indexed citations
10.
Bailey, Phoebe E., et al.. (2015). Age-related similarities and differences in first impressions of trustworthiness. Cognition & Emotion. 30(5). 1017–1026. 29 indexed citations
11.
Pedder, D.J., Gill Terrett, Phoebe E. Bailey, et al.. (2015). Reduced facial reactivity as a contributor to preserved emotion regulation in older adults.. Psychology and Aging. 31(1). 114–125. 18 indexed citations
12.
Bailey, Phoebe E., et al.. (2014). Age differences in conscious versus subconscious social perception: The influence of face age and valence on gaze following.. Psychology and Aging. 29(3). 491–502. 22 indexed citations
13.
Slessor, Gillian, Phoebe E. Bailey, Peter G. Rendell, et al.. (2014). Examining the time course of young and older adults’ mimicry of enjoyment and nonenjoyment smiles.. Emotion. 14(3). 532–544. 15 indexed citations
14.
Terrett, Gill, et al.. (2013). Episodic Future Thinking in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 43(11). 2558–2568. 59 indexed citations
15.
Slessor, Gillian, et al.. (2013). Exploring own-age biases in deception detection. Cognition & Emotion. 28(3). 493–506. 32 indexed citations
16.
Rendell, Peter G., et al.. (2012). Older adults have greater difficulty imagining future rather than atemporal experiences.. Psychology and Aging. 27(4). 1089–1098. 53 indexed citations
17.
Henry, Julie D., Louise H. Phillips, Ted Ruffman, & Phoebe E. Bailey. (2012). A meta-analytic review of age differences in theory of mind.. Psychology and Aging. 28(3). 826–839. 301 indexed citations
18.
Varcin, Kandice J., Phoebe E. Bailey, & Julie D. Henry. (2010). Empathic deficits in schizophrenia: The potential role of rapid facial mimicry. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 16(4). 621–629. 80 indexed citations
19.
Bailey, Phoebe E., Julie D. Henry, & William von Hippel. (2008). Empathy and social functioning in late adulthood. Aging & Mental Health. 12(4). 499–503. 172 indexed citations
20.
Bailey, Phoebe E. & Julie D. Henry. (2008). Growing Less Empathic With Age: Disinhibition of the Self-Perspective. The Journals of Gerontology Series B. 63(4). P219–P226. 140 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026