Phillip J. Clapham
- Ecology top 0.2%
- Oceanography top 0.5%
- Atmospheric Science top 1%
- Global and Planetary Change top 2%
- Developmental Biology top 0.2%
- Co-authors
- David K. MattilaRobert L. BrownellAlexandre N. ZerbiniPer J. PalsbøllSharon B. YoungChristopher W. ClarkYulia V. IvashchenkoC. Scott Baker
- Topics
- Marine animal studies overview (98 papers)Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics (48 papers)Underwater Acoustics Research (25 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Phillip J. Clapham
105 papers receiving 4.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
- Ecology 4.3k
- Oceanography 2.3k
- Atmospheric Science 1.6k
- Global and Planetary Change 942
- Developmental Biology 851
Countries citing papers authored by Phillip J. Clapham
This map shows the geographic impact of Phillip J. Clapham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phillip J. Clapham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phillip J. Clapham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Phillip J. Clapham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phillip J. Clapham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phillip J. Clapham. The network helps show where Phillip J. Clapham may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Phillip J. Clapham
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Phillip J. Clapham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Phillip J. Clapham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Phillip J. Clapham. Phillip J. Clapham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | Soviet Illegal Whaling: The Devil and the Details | 46 |
| 13 | Confirmation of right whales near a historic whaling ground east of southern Greenland | 2 |
| 14 | 33 | |
| 15 | 154 | |
| 16 | 49 | |
| 17 | 86 | |
| 18 | 38 | |
| 19 | 262 | |
| 20 | 62 |
About Phillip J. Clapham
Phillip J. Clapham is a scholar working on Developmental Biology, Oceanography and Ecology, having authored 108 papers that have together received 4.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Marine animal studies overview (98 papers), Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics (48 papers) and Underwater Acoustics Research (25 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (851 citations), Oceanography (2.3k citations) and Ecology (4.3k citations). Phillip J. Clapham has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include David K. Mattila, Robert L. Brownell, Alexandre N. Zerbini, Per J. Palsbøll, Sharon B. Young, Christopher W. Clark, Yulia V. Ivashchenko, C. Scott Baker, Jay Barlow and Charles A. Mayo. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Trends in Ecology & Evolution and Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.