Phillip Isabio Pohl
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Materials Chemistry
- Mechanical Engineering
- Environmental Chemistry top 10%
- Co-authors
- Grant S. HeffelfingerPatrick V. BradyJohn C. HewsonDouglas R. SmithAnne GrilletLindsey GloeMatthew G. HankinsNicholas B Wyatt
- Topics
- Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis (4 papers)Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis (4 papers)Nuclear and radioactivity studies (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the EnvironmentEnvironmental ChemistryIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Phillip Isabio Pohl
13 papers receiving 432 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 162
- Biomedical Engineering 134
- Materials Chemistry 81
- Mechanical Engineering 66
- Environmental Chemistry 63
Countries citing papers authored by Phillip Isabio Pohl
This map shows the geographic impact of Phillip Isabio Pohl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phillip Isabio Pohl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phillip Isabio Pohl more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Phillip Isabio Pohl
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phillip Isabio Pohl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phillip Isabio Pohl. The network helps show where Phillip Isabio Pohl may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Phillip Isabio Pohl
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Phillip Isabio Pohl. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Phillip Isabio Pohl based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Phillip Isabio Pohl. Phillip Isabio Pohl is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 47 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 138 | |
| 4 | 34 | |
| 5 | 73 | |
| 6 | Mixed Waste Focus Area -- Waste form initiative | 1 |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 67 | |
| 9 | 28 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | Preliminary Assessment of the Impact of Conceptual Model Uncertainty on Site Performance | 1 |
About Phillip Isabio Pohl
Phillip Isabio Pohl is a scholar working on Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Inorganic Chemistry and Internal Medicine, having authored 14 papers that have together received 445 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis (4 papers), Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis (4 papers) and Nuclear and radioactivity studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (162 citations), Environmental Chemistry (63 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (39 citations). Phillip Isabio Pohl has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Grant S. Heffelfinger, Patrick V. Brady, John C. Hewson, Douglas R. Smith, Anne Grillet, Lindsey Gloe, Matthew G. Hankins, Nicholas B Wyatt, Jean‐Loup Faulon and Douglas M. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Langmuir, Water Resources Research and Journal of Membrane Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.