Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
New urban governance: A review of current themes and future priorities
2018150 citationsNuno F. da Cruz, Philipp Rode et al.Journal of Urban Affairsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Philipp Rode's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philipp Rode with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philipp Rode more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philipp Rode. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philipp Rode. The network helps show where Philipp Rode may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philipp Rode
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philipp Rode.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philipp Rode based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Philipp Rode. Philipp Rode is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rode, Philipp. (2023). Fairness and the Sufficiency Turn in Urban Transport. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 2(1). 37–54.1 indexed citations
Cruz, Nuno F. da, Philipp Rode, & Michael McQuarrie. (2018). New urban governance: A review of current themes and future priorities. Journal of Urban Affairs. 41(1). 1–19.150 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Burdett, Ricky & Philipp Rode. (2018). Shaping Cities in an Urban Age.19 indexed citations
7.
Rode, Philipp. (2018). Ethiopia's railway revolution. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).2 indexed citations
Rode, Philipp. (2017). Moving parts: how the design of vehicles shapes cities. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).
Rode, Philipp, Muhammad Adeel, Carlos F. Lange, et al.. (2017). Resource urbanisms: Asia’s divergent city models of Kuwait, Abu Dhabi, Singapore and Hong Kong. White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York).8 indexed citations
Rode, Philipp, et al.. (2010). Kunst macht Stadt. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks.2 indexed citations
18.
Rode, Philipp, et al.. (2009). Cities and social equity: inequality, territory and urban form. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 11(3). 207–217.4 indexed citations
19.
Rode, Philipp, et al.. (2007). The Urban Age project. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).1 indexed citations
20.
Travers, Tony, et al.. (2005). Density and urban neighbourhoods in London: summary report. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 17(1). 96–7.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.