Philip W. Smith

69 total papers · 1.5k total citations
52 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Philip W. Smith is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip W. Smith has authored 52 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 14 papers in Ecological Modeling and 11 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Philip W. Smith's work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (17 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (14 papers) and Animal and Plant Science Education (9 papers). Philip W. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Fish Ecology and Management Studies (17 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (14 papers) and Animal and Plant Science Education (9 papers). Philip W. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States and South Africa. Philip W. Smith's co-authors include Henry S. Fitch, R. Weldon Larimore, Paul Anderson, Donald E. Barker, Vicente A. Mejia, Benjamin W. Dart, Amy N. Hildreth, Robert A. Maxwell, Lawrence M. Page and Sherman A. Minton and has published in prestigious journals such as Ecology, Copeia and Transactions of the American Mathematical Society.

In The Last Decade

Philip W. Smith

47 papers receiving 719 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Philip W. Smith 537 471 313 144 137 52 1.1k
Larry G. Talent 356 0.7× 538 1.1× 479 1.5× 333 2.3× 47 0.3× 46 1.4k
Reuben R. Goforth 530 1.0× 527 1.1× 144 0.5× 38 0.3× 178 1.3× 46 1.3k
Kim D. Hyatt 821 1.5× 882 1.9× 332 1.1× 266 1.8× 110 0.8× 39 1.5k
Frank A. von Hippel 358 0.7× 374 0.8× 95 0.3× 148 1.0× 79 0.6× 69 1.2k
Cornelia W. Twining 347 0.6× 755 1.6× 241 0.8× 157 1.1× 243 1.8× 32 1.2k
Edward M. Dzialowski 129 0.2× 534 1.1× 202 0.6× 303 2.1× 46 0.3× 60 1.2k
Thomas C. Nelson 231 0.4× 175 0.4× 130 0.4× 148 1.0× 24 0.2× 54 1.1k
Pascal Sirois 747 1.4× 623 1.3× 654 2.1× 55 0.4× 267 1.9× 81 1.3k
E. W. Fager 215 0.4× 517 1.1× 330 1.1× 203 1.4× 30 0.2× 20 1.2k
Dennis M. Power 299 0.6× 516 1.1× 147 0.5× 314 2.2× 31 0.2× 32 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Philip W. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip W. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip W. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip W. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip W. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip W. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip W. Smith. The network helps show where Philip W. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip W. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip W. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip W. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip W. Smith. Philip W. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026