Philip W. Smith
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 2%
- Ecology top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Aquatic Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- Henry S. FitchR. Weldon LarimorePaul AndersonAmy N. HildrethRobert A. MaxwellDonald E. BarkerBenjamin W. DartVicente A. Mejia
- Topics
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies (17 papers)Species Distribution and Climate Change (14 papers)Animal and Plant Science Education (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth Africa
In The Last Decade
Philip W. Smith
47 papers receiving 720 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 537
- Ecology 471
- Global and Planetary Change 313
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 144
- Aquatic Science 137
Countries citing papers authored by Philip W. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip W. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip W. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip W. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip W. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip W. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip W. Smith. The network helps show where Philip W. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip W. Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip W. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip W. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip W. Smith. Philip W. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 131 | |
| 2 | 25 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | Amphibians & Reptiles of Kentucky | 2 |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | 48 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 141 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | The hemlock borer; the European pine shoot moth and its relation to pines in Wisconsin | 1 |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Philip W. Smith
Philip W. Smith is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Theoretical Computer Science, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (17 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (14 papers) and Animal and Plant Science Education (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (537 citations), Ecological Modeling (116 citations) and Aquatic Science (137 citations). Philip W. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Henry S. Fitch, R. Weldon Larimore, Paul Anderson, Amy N. Hildreth, Robert A. Maxwell, Donald E. Barker, Benjamin W. Dart, Vicente A. Mejia, Lawrence M. Page and Sherman A. Minton. Their work appears in journals such as Ecology, Copeia and Transactions of the American Mathematical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.