Philip Thomas

102 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Philip Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 154
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 168
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 106
  • General Decision Sciences 38
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 158
  • Artificial Intelligence 367
Replace Gene I. Rochlin with:
Gene I. Rochlin United States
Theodore Modis Switzerland
Chauncey Starr United States
Yulong Li China
Phillip N. Price United States
T. Lwin Australia
Paul Baybutt United States
Sajjad Ahmad Khan Pakistan
Ričardas Zitikis Canada
Kenji Takeuchi Japan
Philip Thomas relative to Gene I. Rochlin United States Gene I. Rochlin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.8×
Gene I. Rochlin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Thomas. The network helps show where Philip Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Philip Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 108 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1977160
2 2021137
3 2022126
4 202157
5 202152
6 201443
7 201342
8 200639
9 201539
10 198931
11 202129
12 201728
13 199827
14 201727
15 200625
16 200223
17 201022
18 200621
19 201018
20 201417

About Philip Thomas

Philip Thomas is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 108 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Risk Perception and Management (15 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (10 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (9 papers), Nuclear and radioactivity studies (9 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (7 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (7 papers), Radioactive contamination and transfer (6 papers) and Quantum Mechanics and Applications (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (168 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (106 citations), General Decision Sciences (38 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (158 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (367 citations). Philip Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Gerhard Rempe, Olivier Morin, R.D. Jones, Stefan Langenfeld, Reidar B. Bratvold, Lukas Hartung, Severin Daiss, Emanuele Distante, Stephan Welte and I. Waddington. Their work appears in journals such as Process Safety and Environmental Protection, Measurement, British Food Journal, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part A Journal of Power and Energy and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact