Philip Tata

9.0k total citations · 2 hit papers
41 papers, 6.9k citations indexed

About

Philip Tata is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Tata has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 6.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Clinical Psychology, 15 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 8 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Philip Tata's work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (9 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (8 papers) and Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (7 papers). Philip Tata is often cited by papers focused on Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (9 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (8 papers) and Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (7 papers). Philip Tata collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and New Zealand. Philip Tata's co-authors include Colin MacLeod, Andrew Mathews, Chris R. Brewin, Martina Reynolds, Peter Tyrer, Andrew K. MacLeod, John Green, Edna B. Foa, Bernice Andrews and Suzanna Rose and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Abnormal Psychology, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Psychological Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Philip Tata

41 papers receiving 6.7k citations

Hit Papers

Attentional bias in emotional disorders. 1986 2026 1999 2012 1986 1986 500 1000 1.5k 2.0k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Philip Tata United Kingdom 26 3.7k 3.4k 2.5k 979 734 41 6.9k
Michelle L. Moulds Australia 47 4.2k 1.1× 5.2k 1.5× 1.6k 0.7× 1.2k 1.3× 648 0.9× 174 8.2k
Nader Amir United States 55 6.3k 1.7× 5.3k 1.5× 3.6k 1.5× 902 0.9× 810 1.1× 136 8.7k
S. Rachman Canada 44 2.8k 0.8× 3.3k 1.0× 1.9k 0.8× 984 1.0× 671 0.9× 105 5.8k
Michael J. Kozak United States 35 4.5k 1.2× 7.2k 2.1× 3.1k 1.2× 1.4k 1.4× 1.2k 1.6× 63 10.5k
Rick E. Ingram United States 42 4.0k 1.1× 4.2k 1.2× 1.3k 0.5× 1.9k 1.9× 646 0.9× 130 7.3k
Ross G. Menzies Australia 42 2.9k 0.8× 4.4k 1.3× 2.1k 0.9× 984 1.0× 414 0.6× 176 6.4k
Jennifer Y. F. Lau United Kingdom 42 2.6k 0.7× 3.2k 0.9× 1.9k 0.8× 1.0k 1.0× 696 0.9× 184 6.3k
Meredith E. Coles United States 49 5.8k 1.6× 7.3k 2.1× 2.6k 1.1× 1.4k 1.5× 1.2k 1.6× 133 10.1k
John P. Forsyth United States 35 2.9k 0.8× 4.4k 1.3× 837 0.3× 1.4k 1.4× 784 1.1× 92 6.3k
Ann Hackmann United Kingdom 43 4.3k 1.2× 5.6k 1.6× 1.5k 0.6× 1.1k 1.1× 1.7k 2.4× 66 8.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Tata

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Tata's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Tata with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Tata more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Tata

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Tata. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Tata. The network helps show where Philip Tata may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Tata

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Tata. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Tata based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Tata. Philip Tata is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Tata, Philip, et al.. (2016). Personal Goals, Well-Being and Deliberate Self-Harm. Cognitive Therapy and Research. 41(3). 434–443. 10 indexed citations
3.
MacLeod, Andrew K., et al.. (2010). Painful engagement in deliberate self-harm: The role of conditional goal setting. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 48(9). 915–920. 12 indexed citations
4.
Davidson, K., Peter Tyrer, Philip Tata, et al.. (2008). Cognitive behaviour therapy for violent men with antisocial personality disorder in the community: an exploratory randomized controlled trial. Psychological Medicine. 39(4). 569–577. 70 indexed citations
5.
Brown, Gary, et al.. (2007). Counterfactual thinking and psychological distress following recurrent miscarriage. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 25(1). 51–65. 27 indexed citations
6.
Davidson, Kate, John Norrie, Peter Tyrer, et al.. (2006). The Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Borderline Personality Disorder: Results from the Borderline Personality Disorder Study of Cognitive Therapy (BOSCOT) Trial. Journal of Personality Disorders. 20(5). 450–465. 220 indexed citations
7.
MacLeod, Andrew K., Philip Tata, Peter Tyrer, et al.. (2005). Hopelessness and positive and negative future thinking in parasuicide. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 44(4). 495–504. 101 indexed citations
8.
9.
MacLeod, Andrew K., Philip Tata, Peter Tyrer, et al.. (2004). Personality Disorder and Future-Directed Thinking in Parasuicide. Journal of Personality Disorders. 18(5). 459–466. 19 indexed citations
10.
Brewin, Chris R., Suzanna Rose, Bernice Andrews, et al.. (2002). Brief screening instrument for post-traumatic stress disorder. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 181(2). 158–162. 401 indexed citations
11.
Brewin, Chris R., Suzanna Rose, Bernice Andrews, et al.. (2002). Brief screening instrument for post-traumatic stress disorder. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 181(2). 158–162. 311 indexed citations
12.
Evans, Kerry, Peter Tyrer, José Catalán, et al.. (1999). Manual-assisted cognitive-behaviour therapy (MACT): a randomized controlled trial of a brief intervention with bibliotherapy in the treatment of recurrent deliberate self-harm. Psychological Medicine. 29(1). 19–25. 172 indexed citations
13.
MacLeod, Andrew K., et al.. (1997). Retrospective and Prospective Cognitions in Anxiety and Depression. Cognition & Emotion. 11(4). 467–479. 146 indexed citations
14.
Tata, Philip, et al.. (1996). Attentional bias in Obsessional Compulsive Disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 34(1). 53–60. 122 indexed citations
15.
Tata, Philip, et al.. (1996). Mood, learned resourcefulness and perceptions of control in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 40(2). 205–212. 17 indexed citations
16.
Tata, Philip, et al.. (1996). Does providing more accessible primary care psychology services lower the clinical threshold for referrals?. PubMed. 46(409). 469–72. 6 indexed citations
17.
Tata, Philip & Gisli H. Gudjónsson. (1990). The effects of mood and verbal feedback on interrogative suggestibility. Personality and Individual Differences. 11(10). 1079–1085. 19 indexed citations
18.
Eves, Frank F. & Philip Tata. (1989). Phasic Cardiac and Electrodermal Reactions to Idiographic Stimuli in Obsessional Subjects. Behavioural Psychotherapy. 17(1). 71–82. 3 indexed citations
19.
MacLeod, Colin, Philip Tata, & Andrew Mathews. (1987). Perception of emotionally valenced information in depression. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 26(1). 67–68. 30 indexed citations
20.
MacLeod, Colin, Andrew Mathews, & Philip Tata. (1986). Attentional bias in emotional disorders.. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 95(1). 15–20. 2101 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026