Philip T. Ninan
- Pharmacology top 0.1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 0.2%
- Clinical Psychology top 0.5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Co-authors
- A. John RushSusan G. KornsteinMichael E. ThaseMadhukar H. TrivediMartin B. KellerDaniel N. KleinJames H. KocsisJohn C. Markowitz
- Topics
- Treatment of Major Depression (51 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (36 papers)Mental Health Research Topics (24 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyCanada
In The Last Decade
Philip T. Ninan
102 papers receiving 8.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
- Pharmacology 2.8k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 2.7k
- Clinical Psychology 2.6k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 2.2k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.5k
Countries citing papers authored by Philip T. Ninan
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip T. Ninan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip T. Ninan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip T. Ninan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip T. Ninan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip T. Ninan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip T. Ninan. The network helps show where Philip T. Ninan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip T. Ninan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip T. Ninan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip T. Ninan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip T. Ninan. Philip T. Ninan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 43 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 75 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 46 | |
| 11 | 41 | |
| 12 | 270 | |
| 13 | 254 | |
| 14 | The 16-Item quick inventory of depressive symptomatology (QIDS), clinician rating (QIDS-C), and self-report (QIDS-SR): a psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depressionbreakdown → | 2955 |
| 15 | 74 | |
| 16 | Introduction: Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Why Are We Failing Our Patients? | 5 |
| 17 | 35 | |
| 18 | 120 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 70 |
About Philip T. Ninan
Philip T. Ninan is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Pharmacology, having authored 111 papers that have together received 8.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Treatment of Major Depression (51 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (36 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (24 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (1.1k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (2.7k citations) and Pharmacology (2.8k citations). Philip T. Ninan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include A. John Rush, Susan G. Kornstein, Michael E. Thase, Madhukar H. Trivedi, Martin B. Keller, Daniel N. Klein, James H. Kocsis, John C. Markowitz, Rachel Manber and Bruce A. Arnow. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.