Philip Spencer

592 total citations
20 papers, 235 citations indexed

About

Philip Spencer is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Literature and Literary Theory. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Spencer has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 235 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 5 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 3 papers in Literature and Literary Theory. Recurrent topics in Philip Spencer's work include Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (4 papers), French Literature and Criticism (3 papers) and Historical and Literary Analyses (2 papers). Philip Spencer is often cited by papers focused on Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (4 papers), French Literature and Criticism (3 papers) and Historical and Literary Analyses (2 papers). Philip Spencer collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Mexico. Philip Spencer's co-authors include Howard Wollman, Robert Fine, Gustave Flaubert and Klaus Hack and has published in prestigious journals such as Calphad, The Modern Language Review and European Societies.

In The Last Decade

Philip Spencer

16 papers receiving 195 citations

Peers

Philip Spencer
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Sociology and Political Science 151
  • Political Science and International Relations 107
  • Anthropology 26
  • Cultural Studies 21
  • History 20
Replace Howard Wollman with:
Howard Wollman United Kingdom
Leyla Neyzi Türkiye
Roger D. Long United States
Mary C. Neuburger United States
Willfried Spohn Germany
Hue-Tam Ho Tai United States
Stephen Sheehi United States
Cynthia E. Milton Canada
Paul Bailey United Kingdom
Bart Luttikhuis Netherlands
Howard Wollman United Kingdom View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Philip Spencer
Philip Spencer · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Philip Spencer
Philip Spencer · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Spencer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Spencer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Spencer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Spencer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Spencer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Spencer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Spencer. The network helps show where Philip Spencer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Spencer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Spencer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Spencer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Spencer. Philip Spencer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 2
3 8
4 1
5 2
6 4
7
The Left, radical antisemitism, and the problem of genocide
1
8
Book Review of: Urban fears and global terrors: citizenship, multicultures and belongings after 7/7 by Victor Jeleniewski Seidler
1
9 4
10 78
11 24
12 68
13 23
14 0
15 3
16 12
17 1
18 0
19 1
20
Flaubert : a biography
1

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026