Philip S. Craig

15.2k citations
254 papers · 11.2k indexed · 2 hit papers · h-index 56

Philip S. Craig

251 papers receiving 10.9k citations

Hit Papers

Ecology and Life Cycle Patterns of Echin...3142007202620132019100200300400

Peers

Philip S. Craig
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
  • Parasitology 6.0k
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 9.8k
  • Surgery 7.3k
  • Urology 760
  • Ecology 2.6k
Replace Akira Ito with:
Akira Ito Japan
Ana Flisser Mexico
Z. Pawłowski Poland
Mar Siles‐Lucas Spain
Sarah Gabriël Belgium
Maria Vang Johansen Denmark
Edoardo Pozio Italy
Felix Grimm Switzerland
Franck Boué France
P. F. L. Boreham Australia
Philip S. Craig relative to Akira Ito Japan Akira Ito's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Akira Ito · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip S. Craig

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip S. Craig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip S. Craig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip S. Craig more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip S. Craig

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip S. Craig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip S. Craig. The network helps show where Philip S. Craig may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip S. Craig, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip S. Craig Line = papers co-authored together Philip S. Craig links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20210
2 201830
3 2015100
4 201519
5 201036
6 200933
7 200938
8 200723
9
Children serology of echinococcosis infection as an environmental health indicator to guide preventive activities in Ningxia, PR China
20071
10 200634
11 2006177
12 200333
13
Characteristics of the summer tibetan fox (Vulpes ferrilata) den habitats in Shiqu County, western Sichuan Province
20034
14 200324
15 200362
16
Cestode zoonoses : echinococcosis and cysticercosis : an emergent and global problem
200262
17 2002118
18
Endo-testing: unit testing with mock objects
200189
19 200160
20 199422

About Philip S. Craig

Philip S. Craig is a scholar working on Parasitology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Surgery, having authored 254 papers that have together received 11.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parasitic infections in humans and animals (229 papers), Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery (141 papers), Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics (129 papers), Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (52 papers), Amoebic Infections and Treatments (23 papers), Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration (16 papers), Toxoplasma gondii Research Studies (16 papers) and Parasites and Host Interactions (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Parasitology (6.0k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (9.8k citations) and Surgery (7.3k citations). Philip S. Craig has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and France. Frequent co-authors include Akira Ito, M.T. Rogan, J. C. Allan, Patrick Giraudoux, Peter M. Schantz, Donald P. McManus, Hao Wen, Dominique A. Vuitton, Minoru Nakao and Tiaoying Li. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, PLoS ONE and Remote Sensing of Environment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026