Philip S. Craig
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.02%
- Surgery top 0.1%
- Parasitology top 0.02%
- Ecology top 0.5%
- Infectious Diseases top 1%
- Co-authors
- Akira ItoM.T. RoganJ. C. AllanPatrick GiraudouxPeter M. SchantzDonald P. McManusHao WenDominique A. Vuitton
- Topics
- Parasitic infections in humans and animals (229 papers)Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery (141 papers)Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics (129 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomChinaFrance
In The Last Decade
Philip S. Craig
251 papers receiving 10.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 9.8k
- Surgery 7.3k
- Parasitology 6.0k
- Ecology 2.6k
- Infectious Diseases 1.5k
Countries citing papers authored by Philip S. Craig
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip S. Craig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip S. Craig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip S. Craig more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip S. Craig
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip S. Craig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip S. Craig. The network helps show where Philip S. Craig may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip S. Craig
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip S. Craig. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip S. Craig based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip S. Craig. Philip S. Craig is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 30 | |
| 3 | 100 | |
| 4 | 19 | |
| 5 | 36 | |
| 6 | 33 | |
| 7 | 38 | |
| 8 | 23 | |
| 9 | Children serology of echinococcosis infection as an environmental health indicator to guide preventive activities in Ningxia, PR China | 1 |
| 10 | 34 | |
| 11 | 177 | |
| 12 | 33 | |
| 13 | Characteristics of the summer tibetan fox (Vulpes ferrilata) den habitats in Shiqu County, western Sichuan Province | 4 |
| 14 | 24 | |
| 15 | 62 | |
| 16 | Cestode zoonoses : echinococcosis and cysticercosis : an emergent and global problem | 62 |
| 17 | 118 | |
| 18 | Endo-testing: unit testing with mock objects | 89 |
| 19 | 60 | |
| 20 | 22 |
About Philip S. Craig
Philip S. Craig is a scholar working on Parasitology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Surgery, having authored 254 papers that have together received 11.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parasitic infections in humans and animals (229 papers), Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery (141 papers) and Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics (129 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Parasitology (6.0k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (9.8k citations) and Surgery (7.3k citations). Philip S. Craig has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and France. Frequent co-authors include Akira Ito, M.T. Rogan, J. C. Allan, Patrick Giraudoux, Peter M. Schantz, Donald P. McManus, Hao Wen, Dominique A. Vuitton, Minoru Nakao and Tiaoying Li. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, PLoS ONE and Remote Sensing of Environment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.