Philip Measor

54 total papers · 499 total citations
30 papers, 359 citations indexed

About

Philip Measor is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Measor has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 359 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 18 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering and 14 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Philip Measor's work include Photonic and Optical Devices (13 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (9 papers) and Photonic Crystals and Applications (8 papers). Philip Measor is often cited by papers focused on Photonic and Optical Devices (13 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (9 papers) and Photonic Crystals and Applications (8 papers). Philip Measor collaborates with scholars based in United States and Switzerland. Philip Measor's co-authors include Holger Schmidt, Aaron R. Hawkins, Evan J. Lunt, Brian S. Phillips, Sergei Kühn, Dongliang Yin, Leo Seballos, Jin Z. Zhang, S. Kühn and Yüe Zhao and has published in prestigious journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Optics Letters and Optics Express.

In The Last Decade

Philip Measor

27 papers receiving 348 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Philip Measor 244 224 126 45 31 30 359
Jhonattan C. Ramírez 286 1.2× 163 0.7× 135 1.1× 32 0.7× 18 0.6× 27 403
Aviad Katiyi 194 0.8× 150 0.7× 154 1.2× 64 1.4× 14 0.5× 18 302
Yuye Wang 116 0.5× 223 1.0× 84 0.7× 28 0.6× 7 0.2× 30 386
J. G. Ortega-Mendoza 185 0.8× 193 0.9× 94 0.7× 51 1.1× 6 0.2× 33 341
Peter Sperber 108 0.4× 278 1.2× 114 0.9× 26 0.6× 17 0.5× 33 380
Ron Spittel 249 1.0× 84 0.4× 102 0.8× 29 0.6× 45 1.5× 24 344
M. A. Bader 165 0.7× 160 0.7× 141 1.1× 100 2.2× 22 0.7× 23 331
Mohammad Hazhir Mozaffari 287 1.2× 234 1.0× 113 0.9× 72 1.6× 3 0.1× 18 372
A. E. Afanasiev 95 0.4× 239 1.1× 212 1.7× 154 3.4× 14 0.5× 35 357
Felix Richter 141 0.6× 146 0.7× 180 1.4× 136 3.0× 7 0.2× 29 387

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Measor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Measor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Measor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Measor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Measor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Measor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Measor. The network helps show where Philip Measor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Measor

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Measor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Measor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Measor. Philip Measor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026