Philip Mathew
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology top 2%
- Molecular Medicine top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Epidemiology
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
- Co-authors
- Sujith J ChandyVenkata Raghava MohanRahul KrishnanRajan SrinivasanDevika PillaiKesavan Rajasekharan NayarMirfin MpunduRajeev Aravindakshan
- Topics
- Antibiotic Use and Resistance (9 papers)Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (6 papers)Global Maternal and Child Health (3 papers)
- Journals
- Nature CommunicationsSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe Lancet Global Health
- Partner nations
- IndiaSwitzerlandUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Philip Mathew
23 papers receiving 277 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 102
- Molecular Medicine 53
- General Health Professions 48
- Epidemiology 38
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 34
Countries citing papers authored by Philip Mathew
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Mathew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Mathew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Mathew more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Mathew
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Mathew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Mathew. The network helps show where Philip Mathew may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Mathew
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Mathew. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Mathew based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Mathew. Philip Mathew is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 20 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 47 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 49 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | 30 | |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | Prevalence of Self Medication in an Urban Slum Area in Maharashtra | 3 |
About Philip Mathew
Philip Mathew is a scholar working on Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Molecular Medicine and Health, having authored 27 papers that have together received 285 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotic Use and Resistance (9 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (6 papers) and Global Maternal and Child Health (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (102 citations), Molecular Medicine (53 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (21 citations). Philip Mathew has collaborated with scholars based in India, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sujith J Chandy, Venkata Raghava Mohan, Rahul Krishnan, Rajan Srinivasan, Devika Pillai, Kesavan Rajasekharan Nayar, Mirfin Mpundu, Rajeev Aravindakshan, Reena Thomas and Elsheba Mathew. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and The Lancet Global Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.