Philip M. E. Garboden
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Finance top 2%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Urban Studies top 5%
- Co-authors
- Eva RosenStefanie DeLucaPeter RosenblattSandra J. NewmanKathryn EdinBrian J. McCabeTama LeventhalMichael Braverman
- Topics
- Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (15 papers)Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (12 papers)Housing Market and Economics (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Philip M. E. Garboden
19 papers receiving 541 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Sociology and Political Science 383
- Finance 285
- General Health Professions 265
- Economics and Econometrics 221
- Urban Studies 62
Countries citing papers authored by Philip M. E. Garboden
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip M. E. Garboden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip M. E. Garboden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip M. E. Garboden more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip M. E. Garboden
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip M. E. Garboden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip M. E. Garboden. The network helps show where Philip M. E. Garboden may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip M. E. Garboden
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip M. E. Garboden. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip M. E. Garboden based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip M. E. Garboden. Philip M. E. Garboden is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 83 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 31 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 133 | |
| 13 | 45 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 25 | |
| 16 | The Power of Place: How Housing Policy Can Boost Educational Opportunity. | 7 |
| 17 | Psychometrics of Housing Quality Measurement in the American Housing Survey | 6 |
| 18 | 110 | |
| 19 | 34 | |
| 20 | Why Don’t Vouchers Do a Better Job of Deconcentrating Poverty? Insights from Fieldwork with Poor Families | 4 |
About Philip M. E. Garboden
Philip M. E. Garboden is a scholar working on Finance, Urban Studies and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 22 papers that have together received 566 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (15 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (12 papers) and Housing Market and Economics (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Finance (285 citations), Urban Studies (62 citations) and General Health Professions (265 citations). Philip M. E. Garboden has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Eva Rosen, Stefanie DeLuca, Peter Rosenblatt, Sandra J. Newman, Kathryn Edin, Brian J. McCabe, Tama Leventhal, Michael Braverman, J. D. Evans and Tamás Budavári. Their work appears in journals such as American Sociological Review, Social Problems and Journal of the American Planning Association.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.