Philip Leith

491 citations
51 papers · 189 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Philip Leith

36 papers receiving 143 citations

Peers

Philip Leith
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Law 64
  • Political Science and International Relations 93
  • Artificial Intelligence 67
  • Communication 14
  • Marketing 12
Replace Jon Bing with:
Jon Bing Norway
David Banisar United Kingdom
Chris Reed United Kingdom
Archil Chochia Estonia
Cătălina Goanță Netherlands
Lorna Woods United Kingdom
Giovanni De Gregorio Italy
Julia Pohle Germany
Maja Brkan Netherlands
Benjamin Farrand United Kingdom
Philip Leith relative to Jon Bing Norway Jon Bing's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Jon Bing · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Leith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Leith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Leith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Leith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Leith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Leith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Leith. The network helps show where Philip Leith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Philip Leith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Leith Line = papers co-authored together Philip Leith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198623
2
The Barrister's World: And the Nature of Law
199121
3
THE RISE AND FALL OF THE LEGAL EXPERT SYSTEM
201019
4 201615
5 200413
6 198311
7 19988
8 20077
9 20047
10 19885
11 19864
12 19874
13 20094
14
Software Utility Models and SMEs.
20003
15 20013
16
Legal Education in Germany: becoming a Lawyer, Judge, and Professor
19953
17 19913
18 20003
19 20063
20
The Jurisprudence of Orthodoxy: Queen's University Essays on H.L.A.Hart
19883

About Philip Leith

Philip Leith is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Law, Sociology and Political Science, Artificial Intelligence and Strategy and Management, having authored 51 papers that have together received 189 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Artificial Intelligence in Law (18 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (17 papers), Comparative and International Law Studies (8 papers), Law in Society and Culture (6 papers), Dispute Resolution and Class Actions (5 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers), Intellectual Property and Patents (3 papers) and Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (64 citations), Political Science and International Relations (93 citations), Artificial Intelligence (67 citations), Communication (14 citations) and Marketing (12 citations). Philip Leith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Russia and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include John Morison, C. E. Fellows, Subhajit Basu, J. M. Morrison, Joe Duffy and David Newman. Their work appears in journals such as International Review of Law Computers & Technology, International Journal of Law and Information Technology, Software Practice and Experience, The Computer Journal and International Journal of Law in Context.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact