Philip L. Salmon

553 total citations
7 papers, 445 citations indexed

About

Philip L. Salmon is a scholar working on Physiology, Molecular Biology and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip L. Salmon has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 445 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Physiology, 2 papers in Molecular Biology and 2 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine. Recurrent topics in Philip L. Salmon's work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (2 papers) and Pain Management and Opioid Use (1 paper). Philip L. Salmon is often cited by papers focused on Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (2 papers) and Pain Management and Opioid Use (1 paper). Philip L. Salmon collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and United Kingdom. Philip L. Salmon's co-authors include Jenneke Klein‐Nulend, Theo H. Smit, Cornelis M. Semeins, A. Vatsa, Roel G.M. Breuls, Theo Meert, Peter A. Nolte, Ruud P. van Hove, R. Biermans and Rony Nuydens and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Bone and Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Philip L. Salmon

7 papers receiving 439 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Philip L. Salmon Netherlands	6	205	181	86	85	71	7	445
Zeynep Şeref-Ferlengez United States	9	222 1.1×	239 1.3×	93 1.1×	52 0.6×	56 0.8×	10	484
Odile Barou France	9	234 1.1×	170 0.9×	96 1.1×	56 0.7×	19 0.3×	10	498
Brandon J. Ausk United States	11	169 0.8×	168 0.9×	59 0.7×	30 0.4×	98 1.4×	19	414
J.G.H. Sterck Netherlands	6	163 0.8×	196 1.1×	70 0.8×	43 0.5×	89 1.3×	9	422
Zehui Li United States	9	72 0.4×	236 1.3×	55 0.6×	61 0.7×	62 0.9×	13	437
C. Alexandre France	5	201 1.0×	118 0.7×	77 0.9×	45 0.5×	14 0.2×	6	394
Zvi Shimshoni Israel	7	84 0.4×	137 0.8×	76 0.9×	51 0.6×	52 0.7×	7	327
Antonia Torcasio Belgium	8	143 0.7×	110 0.6×	73 0.8×	14 0.2×	31 0.4×	10	371
Pamela Cabahug‐Zuckerman United States	7	101 0.5×	178 1.0×	42 0.5×	44 0.5×	63 0.9×	8	335
Federica Francesca Masieri Italy	11	60 0.3×	91 0.5×	35 0.4×	136 1.6×	15 0.2×	16	477

Countries citing papers authored by Philip L. Salmon

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip L. Salmon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip L. Salmon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip L. Salmon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip L. Salmon

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip L. Salmon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip L. Salmon. The network helps show where Philip L. Salmon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip L. Salmon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip L. Salmon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip L. Salmon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip L. Salmon. Philip L. Salmon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Javaheri, Behzâd, Alessandra Carriero, Katherine Staines, et al.. (2015). Phospho1 deficiency transiently modifies bone architecture yet produces consistent modification in osteocyte differentiation and vascular porosity with ageing. Bone. 81. 277–291. 36 indexed citations

2.

Salmon, Philip L. & Xuan Liu. (2014). MicroCT Bone Densitometry: Context Sensitivity, Beam Hardening Correction and the Effect of Surrounding Media. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2. 1–25. 10 indexed citations

3.

Hove, Ruud P. van, Peter A. Nolte, A. Vatsa, et al.. (2009). Osteocyte morphology in human tibiae of different bone pathologies with different bone mineral density — Is there a role for mechanosensing?. Bone. 45(2). 321–329. 121 indexed citations

4.

Salmon, Philip L., et al.. (2009). Anecdotes: Magnavox and Intel: An Odyssey and The Early Days of the Arpanet. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing. 31(3). 64–67. 2 indexed citations

5.

Vatsa, A., Roel G.M. Breuls, Cornelis M. Semeins, et al.. (2008). Osteocyte morphology in fibula and calvaria — Is there a role for mechanosensing?. Bone. 43(3). 452–458. 176 indexed citations

6.

Biermans, R., et al.. (2007). Evaluation of pain behavior and bone destruction in two arthritic models in guinea pig and rat. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior. 87(3). 349–359. 55 indexed citations

7.

Nuydens, Rony, et al.. (2004). Bone cancer pain model in mice: evaluation of pain behavior, bone destruction and morphine sensitivity. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior. 79(2). 243–251. 45 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact