Philip Joseph
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Social Psychology
- General Health Professions
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Co-authors
- Sarah MarriottJeremy CoidJulian LeffJoel SolomonDavid SturgeonPeter TyrerLouis ApplebyBenjamin K. Potter
- Topics
- Psychiatric care and mental health services (7 papers)Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (6 papers)Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (5 papers)
- Journals
- Cochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsThe British Journal of PsychiatryInternational Review of Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Philip Joseph
18 papers receiving 268 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Clinical Psychology 186
- Psychiatry and Mental health 104
- Social Psychology 81
- General Health Professions 81
- Literature and Literary Theory 45
Countries citing papers authored by Philip Joseph
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Joseph's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Joseph with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Joseph more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Joseph
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Joseph. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Joseph. The network helps show where Philip Joseph may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Joseph
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Joseph. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Joseph based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Joseph. Philip Joseph is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | Mahatma Gandhi’s Concept of Educational Leadership | 2 |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 102 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 50 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 46 | |
| 11 | 26 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 26 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 35 |
About Philip Joseph
Philip Joseph is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory and Philosophy, having authored 23 papers that have together received 355 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychiatric care and mental health services (7 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (6 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (186 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (104 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (45 citations). Philip Joseph has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Sarah Marriott, Jeremy Coid, Julian Leff, Joel Solomon, David Sturgeon, Peter Tyrer, Jeremy Coid, Louis Appleby, Benjamin K. Potter and John Gunn. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, The British Journal of Psychiatry and International Review of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.