Philip James

173 papers receiving 4.4k citations

Philip James's Hit Papers

The bacterial biogeography of British soils 2011 · 754 citations
7540+5+10Years since publication250500750

Peers

Philip James
Comparison fields: 5 of 178
  • Public Administration 231
  • Soil Science 526
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 222
  • Ecology 918
  • Transportation 212
Replace John W Handmer with:
John W Handmer Australia
Adam Z. Rose United States
Keith William Hipel Canada
Silvio Oscar Funtowicz Italy
Frans Berkhout United Kingdom
Christina Prell United States
Jerome R. Ravetz United Kingdom
Detlof von Winterfeldt United States
Warren E. Walker Netherlands
Art Dewulf Netherlands
Philip James relative to John W Handmer Australia John W Handmer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.5×
John W Handmer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip James

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip James's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip James with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip James more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip James

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip James. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip James. The network helps show where Philip James may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip James, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip James Line = papers co-authored together Philip James links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 184 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The bacterial biogeography of British soils
Hit paper breakdown →
2011754
2 2007391
3 2011384
4 2015225
5 1999174
6 2015147
7 2020123
8 2020100
9 201994
10 201881
11 200580
12 199879
13 200967
14 202163
15 202059
16 200655
17 200154
18 201849
19 199745
20 201344

About Philip James

Philip James is a scholar working on Public Administration, Building and Construction, Geography, Planning and Development, Strategy and Management and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 184 papers that have together received 4.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (28 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (26 papers), Geographic Information Systems Studies (17 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (13 papers), Data Management and Algorithms (12 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (10 papers), Building Energy and Comfort Optimization (9 papers) and Regulation and Compliance Studies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (231 citations), Soil Science (526 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (222 citations), Ecology (918 citations) and Transportation (212 citations). Philip James has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Malta. Frequent co-authors include Bruce C. Thomson, Robert Iwan Griffiths, Andrew Steven Whiteley, Mark Bailey, Thomas Bell, Ian Cunningham, Alistair Ford, David R. Walters, Rajiv Kumar Ranjan and Luke S. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Industrial Law Journal, Personnel Review, Employee Relations, Work Employment and Society and IEEE Cloud Computing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact