Philip J. Hofschire
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Surgery
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Co-authors
- John P. CheathamJohn D. KuglerWilliam H. FlemingWilliam W. PinskyLarry LatsonDavid A. DanfordCarl H. GumbinerJames H. Moller
- Topics
- Congenital Heart Disease Studies (10 papers)Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (6 papers)Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesTunisia
In The Last Decade
Philip J. Hofschire
25 papers receiving 366 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 211
- Epidemiology 207
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 99
- Surgery 98
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 67
Countries citing papers authored by Philip J. Hofschire
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip J. Hofschire's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip J. Hofschire with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip J. Hofschire more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip J. Hofschire
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip J. Hofschire. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip J. Hofschire. The network helps show where Philip J. Hofschire may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip J. Hofschire
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip J. Hofschire. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip J. Hofschire based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip J. Hofschire. Philip J. Hofschire is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 36 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 55 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 40 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 27 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | 33 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Philip J. Hofschire
Philip J. Hofschire is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 391 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Congenital Heart Disease Studies (10 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (6 papers) and Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (211 citations), Epidemiology (207 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (26 citations). Philip J. Hofschire has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Tunisia. Frequent co-authors include John P. Cheatham, John D. Kugler, William H. Fleming, William W. Pinsky, Larry Latson, David A. Danford, Carl H. Gumbiner, James H. Moller, Demétre M. Nicoloff and Edward B. Clark. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, American Psychologist and CHEST Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.