Philip J. Elving
- Electrochemistry top 0.05%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering top 1%
- Bioengineering top 0.1%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Polymers and Plastics top 1%
- Co-authors
- Jacques MoirouxBořivoj JaníkK. S. V. SanthanamGlenn DryhurstIsadore RosenthalConrad O. SchmakelDavid L. SmithWilliam T. Bresnahan
- Topics
- Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (107 papers)Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (49 papers)Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (36 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomIndia
In The Last Decade
Philip J. Elving
199 papers receiving 4.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
- Electrochemistry 3.1k
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 2.7k
- Bioengineering 1.4k
- Molecular Biology 1.2k
- Polymers and Plastics 965
Countries citing papers authored by Philip J. Elving
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip J. Elving's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip J. Elving with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip J. Elving more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip J. Elving
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip J. Elving. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip J. Elving. The network helps show where Philip J. Elving may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip J. Elving
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip J. Elving. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip J. Elving based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip J. Elving. Philip J. Elving is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 20 | |
| 4 | 28 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 64 | |
| 7 | 90 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | Analytical chemistry in industry | 0 |
| 10 | 46 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | Analytical chemistry of the elements | 47 |
| 14 | 70 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 30 | |
| 17 | 18 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 38 | |
| 20 | 8 |
About Philip J. Elving
Philip J. Elving is a scholar working on Electrochemistry, Bioengineering and Filtration and Separation, having authored 200 papers that have together received 5.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (107 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (49 papers) and Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (36 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electrochemistry (3.1k citations), Bioengineering (1.4k citations) and Polymers and Plastics (965 citations). Philip J. Elving has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include Jacques Moiroux, Bořivoj Janík, K. S. V. Santhanam, Glenn Dryhurst, Isadore Rosenthal, Conrad O. Schmakel, David L. Smith, William T. Bresnahan, Zdenĕk Samec and Timothy E. Cummings. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Chemical Reviews and Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.