Philip Habel

717 total citations
24 papers, 366 citations indexed

About

Philip Habel is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Habel has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 366 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 7 papers in Communication and 6 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Philip Habel's work include Social Media and Politics (6 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (6 papers) and Complex Network Analysis Techniques (5 papers). Philip Habel is often cited by papers focused on Social Media and Politics (6 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (6 papers) and Complex Network Analysis Techniques (5 papers). Philip Habel collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Philip Habel's co-authors include J. Tobin Grant, Frederick Solt, Anjie Fang, Iadh Ounis, Craig Macdonald, Sarah E. Anderson, Sarah Birch, Brandon Valeriano, Nut Limsopatham and Kevin M. Scott and has published in prestigious journals such as Political Psychology, Information Communication & Society and Political Communication.

In The Last Decade

Philip Habel

22 papers receiving 336 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Philip Habel United Kingdom	11	187	99	79	56	43	24	366
Marc Trussler United States	7	337 1.8×	157 1.6×	140 1.8×	28 0.5×	65 1.5×	8	532
Mingxiao Sui United States	12	263 1.4×	224 2.3×	66 0.8×	36 0.6×	22 0.5×	30	437
Jia Lu China	11	163 0.9×	110 1.1×	67 0.8×	21 0.4×	23 0.5×	40	342
Yunjuan Luo United States	9	162 0.9×	160 1.6×	38 0.5×	24 0.4×	34 0.8×	14	349
Johannes Kaiser Germany	11	233 1.2×	134 1.4×	32 0.4×	58 1.0×	77 1.8×	21	403
Alessandro Lovari Italy	11	332 1.8×	311 3.1×	68 0.9×	45 0.8×	73 1.7×	43	561
Patrick Kraft United States	8	203 1.1×	75 0.8×	60 0.8×	31 0.6×	22 0.5×	14	303
Anna Brosius Netherlands	13	295 1.6×	190 1.9×	116 1.5×	81 1.4×	28 0.7×	23	440
Nel Ruigrok Netherlands	13	305 1.6×	339 3.4×	61 0.8×	85 1.5×	18 0.4×	28	616

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Habel

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Habel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Habel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Habel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Habel

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Habel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Habel. The network helps show where Philip Habel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Habel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Habel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Habel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Habel. Philip Habel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Habel, Philip. (2025). Conspiracy beliefs old and new, U.S. media old and new. Journal of Information Technology & Politics. 1–23.

Turgeon, Mathieu & Philip Habel. (2021). Prejudice, Political Ideology, and Interest: Understanding Attitudes Toward Affirmative Action in Brazil. Political Psychology. 43(3). 489–510. 3 indexed citations

Fang, Anjie, Philip Habel, Iadh Ounis, & Craig Macdonald. (2019). Votes on Twitter: Assessing Candidate Preferences and Topics of Discussion During the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. SAGE Open. 9(1). 7 indexed citations

Fang, Anjie, et al.. (2018). An Effective Approach for Modelling Time Features for Classifying Bursty Topics on Twitter. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam). 1547–1550. 2 indexed citations

Habel, Philip, et al.. (2017). News and information leadership in the digital age. Information Communication & Society. 21(11). 1604–1619. 5 indexed citations

Fang, Anjie, Craig Macdonald, Iadh Ounis, & Philip Habel. (2016). Examining the Coherence of the Top Ranked Tweet Topics. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam). 825–828. 17 indexed citations

Valeriano, Brandon & Philip Habel. (2016). Who Are the Enemies? The Visual Framing of Enemies in Digital Games. International Studies Review. 18(3). 462–486. 13 indexed citations

Fang, Anjie, Craig Macdonald, Iadh Ounis, & Philip Habel. (2016). Using Word Embedding to Evaluate the Coherence of Topics from Twitter Data. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam). 1057–1060. 32 indexed citations

Fang, Anjie, Iadh Ounis, Philip Habel, Craig Macdonald, & Nut Limsopatham. (2015). Topic-centric Classification of Twitter User’s Political Orientation. Electronic workshops in computing. 2 indexed citations

10.

Habel, Philip, et al.. (2015). The Implications of Salary for the Quality of Nominations to the Federal District Courts, 1964–2012. Justice System Journal. 36(4). 323–340. 1 indexed citations

11.

Fang, Anjie, Iadh Ounis, Philip Habel, Craig Macdonald, & Nut Limsopatham. (2015). Topic-centric Classification of Twitter User's Political Orientation. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam). 791–794. 22 indexed citations

12.

Habel, Philip & Kevin M. Scott. (2014). New Measures of Judges’ Caseload for the Federal District Courts, 1964–2012. 2(1). 153–170. 8 indexed citations

13.

Habel, Philip & J. Tobin Grant. (2013). Demand for God and Government: The Dynamics of Religion and Public Opinion. Politics and Religion. 6(2). 282–302. 8 indexed citations

14.

Habel, Philip. (2012). Following the Opinion Leaders? The Dynamics of Influence Among Media Opinion, the Public, and Politicians. Political Communication. 29(3). 257–277. 27 indexed citations

15.

McClurg, Scott D. & Philip Habel. (2011). Presidential elections: campaigning within a segmented electorate. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam). 1 indexed citations

16.

Solt, Frederick, Philip Habel, & J. Tobin Grant. (2011). Economic Inequality, Relative Power, and Religiosity^*. Social Science Quarterly. 92(2). 447–465. 69 indexed citations

17.

Habel, Philip, et al.. (2011). An Experimental Test of the Effects of Fictional Framing on Attitudes^*. Social Science Quarterly. 92(1). 79–99. 42 indexed citations

18.

Anderson, Sarah E. & Philip Habel. (2008). Revisiting Adjusted ADA Scores for the U.S. Congress, 1947–2007. Political Analysis. 17(1). 83–88. 33 indexed citations

19.

Habel, Philip. (2008). The Consequences of Electoral Institutions for Careerism. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 33(3). 471–494. 5 indexed citations

20.

Currie, Marian J., et al.. (2007). Community-based sexual health care works: a review of the ACT outreach program. Sexual Health. 4(3). 201–204. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact