Philip Goodchild

103 total papers · 1.5k total citations
30 papers, 515 citations indexed

About

Philip Goodchild is a scholar working on Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Goodchild has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 515 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Philosophy, 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Philip Goodchild's work include Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (4 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (4 papers) and Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (2 papers). Philip Goodchild is often cited by papers focused on Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (4 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (4 papers) and Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (2 papers). Philip Goodchild collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Philip Goodchild's co-authors include Daniel Bell, D. Stephen Long, William T. Cavanaugh, Jürgen Moltmann, Susan C. Abraham, E. Gregory and Christopher Rowland and has published in prestigious journals such as Theory Culture & Society, The Philosophical Quarterly and SubStance.

In The Last Decade

Philip Goodchild

22 papers receiving 395 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Philip Goodchild 323 116 85 64 62 30 515
Pierre Hégy 347 1.1× 94 0.8× 120 1.4× 93 1.5× 38 0.6× 36 520
Elizabeth Elbourne 425 1.3× 77 0.7× 90 1.1× 74 1.2× 204 3.3× 26 592
Hent de Vries 343 1.1× 179 1.5× 139 1.6× 41 0.6× 48 0.8× 31 483
Sydney E. Ahlstrom 319 1.0× 85 0.7× 179 2.1× 50 0.8× 31 0.5× 35 496
Michael Anthony Sells 237 0.7× 103 0.9× 140 1.6× 58 0.9× 38 0.6× 43 461
Diana L. Eck 275 0.9× 85 0.7× 121 1.4× 67 1.0× 131 2.1× 21 567
Catherine L. Albanese 234 0.7× 127 1.1× 88 1.0× 36 0.6× 36 0.6× 54 455
Albert Jordy Raboteau 325 1.0× 33 0.3× 98 1.2× 55 0.9× 96 1.5× 37 510
J. Gordon Melton 327 1.0× 130 1.1× 84 1.0× 27 0.4× 34 0.5× 47 514
Paul G. Hiebert 298 0.9× 43 0.4× 79 0.9× 217 3.4× 69 1.1× 28 531

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Goodchild

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Goodchild's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Goodchild with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Goodchild more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Goodchild

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Goodchild. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Goodchild. The network helps show where Philip Goodchild may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Goodchild

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Goodchild. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Goodchild based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Goodchild. Philip Goodchild is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026