Philip E. LeBoit

20.9k total citations · 2 hit papers
219 papers, 12.2k citations indexed

About

Philip E. LeBoit is a scholar working on Oncology, Dermatology and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip E. LeBoit has authored 219 papers receiving a total of 12.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 92 papers in Oncology, 87 papers in Dermatology and 55 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Philip E. LeBoit's work include Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (53 papers), Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research (38 papers) and Cancer and Skin Lesions (36 papers). Philip E. LeBoit is often cited by papers focused on Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (53 papers), Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research (38 papers) and Cancer and Skin Lesions (36 papers). Philip E. LeBoit collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Germany. Philip E. LeBoit's co-authors include Boris C. Bastian, Timothy H. McCalmont, Dan Pinkel, Heinz Kutzner, Klaus J. Busam, Daniel Pinkel, Toshiro Kageshita, Hetal Patel, Eva‐Bettina Bröcker and John A. Curtin and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Nature Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Philip E. LeBoit

214 papers receiving 11.8k citations

Hit Papers

Distinct Sets of Genetic Alterations in Melanoma 2005 2026 2012 2019 2005 2008 500 1000 1.5k

Peers

Philip E. LeBoit
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
  • Oncology 6.0k
  • Molecular Biology 4.4k
  • Dermatology 2.6k
  • Epidemiology 2.0k
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.8k
Replace Seng-Jaw Soong with:
Seng-Jaw Soong United States
Seng‐Jaw Soong United States
Michael Pawlita Germany
Mario A. Luna United States
J. Alain Kummer Netherlands
Stephen J. Forman United States
Alistair J. Cochran United States
Éliane Gluckman France
Mark H. Stoler United States
Hermann Einsele Germany
Seng-Jaw Soong United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Philip E. LeBoit
Philip E. LeBoit · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Philip E. LeBoit
Philip E. LeBoit · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Philip E. LeBoit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip E. LeBoit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip E. LeBoit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip E. LeBoit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip E. LeBoit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip E. LeBoit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip E. LeBoit. The network helps show where Philip E. LeBoit may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip E. LeBoit

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip E. LeBoit. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip E. LeBoit based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip E. LeBoit. Philip E. LeBoit is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 48
3 5
4 30
5 6
6 124
7 5
8 4
9 1
10 32
11 1
12 342
13 2
14 151
15 1
16 12
17 29
18 16
19 4
20 18

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026