Philip D. Nixon

762 total citations
9 papers, 610 citations indexed

About

Philip D. Nixon is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip D. Nixon has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 610 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 3 papers in Neurology and 2 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Philip D. Nixon's work include Motor Control and Adaptation (6 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (3 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers). Philip D. Nixon is often cited by papers focused on Motor Control and Adaptation (6 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (3 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers). Philip D. Nixon collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Philip D. Nixon's co-authors include Richard E. Passingham, Matthew F. S. Rushworth, Patricia Gough, Madeline J. Eacott, Richard E. Passingham, Derick T Wade, Shelley Renowden, Kathryn McDonald and Iona Alexander and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Neuropsychologia and Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

Philip D. Nixon

9 papers receiving 601 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Philip D. Nixon United Kingdom	9	521	151	105	76	52	9	610
Paul Aparicio United States	6	464 0.9×	168 1.1×	116 1.1×	60 0.8×	34 0.7×	7	557
Paolo Maria Rossini Italy	6	319 0.6×	100 0.7×	171 1.6×	45 0.6×	43 0.8×	7	438
Catherine L. Elsinger United States	10	612 1.2×	92 0.6×	128 1.2×	117 1.5×	80 1.5×	10	764
Peggy Wackenier Belgium	6	260 0.5×	118 0.8×	46 0.4×	74 1.0×	61 1.2×	7	518
Erie D. Boorman United Kingdom	7	880 1.7×	214 1.4×	112 1.1×	41 0.5×	101 1.9×	7	994
Tobias Waechter United States	6	403 0.8×	145 1.0×	93 0.9×	45 0.6×	36 0.7×	8	563
M. M. Quallo United Kingdom	8	435 0.8×	82 0.5×	315 3.0×	90 1.2×	63 1.2×	8	598
C. Kertzman United States	10	561 1.1×	47 0.3×	85 0.8×	30 0.4×	65 1.3×	10	667
Michele Franca Italy	11	515 1.0×	407 2.7×	166 1.6×	70 0.9×	25 0.5×	14	657
Nadia Alahyane France	18	812 1.6×	286 1.9×	78 0.7×	35 0.5×	113 2.2×	30	995

Countries citing papers authored by Philip D. Nixon

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip D. Nixon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip D. Nixon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip D. Nixon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip D. Nixon

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip D. Nixon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip D. Nixon. The network helps show where Philip D. Nixon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip D. Nixon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip D. Nixon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip D. Nixon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip D. Nixon. Philip D. Nixon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Nixon, Philip D., Kathryn McDonald, Patricia Gough, Iona Alexander, & Richard E. Passingham. (2004). Cortico‐basal ganglia pathways are essential for the recall of well–established visuomotor associations. European Journal of Neuroscience. 20(11). 3165–3178. 42 indexed citations

2.

Nixon, Philip D., et al.. (2004). The Inferior Frontal Gyrus and Phonological Processing: An Investigation using rTMS. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 16(2). 289–300. 155 indexed citations

3.

Nixon, Philip D.. (2003). The role of the cerebellum in preparing responses to predictable sensory events. The Cerebellum. 2(2). 114–122. 63 indexed citations

4.

Nixon, Philip D. & Richard E. Passingham. (2001). Predicting sensory events. Experimental Brain Research. 138(2). 251–257. 46 indexed citations

5.

Nixon, Philip D. & Richard E. Passingham. (1999). The cerebellum and cognition: cerebellar lesions do not impair spatial working memory or visual associative learning in monkeys. European Journal of Neuroscience. 11(11). 4070–4080. 41 indexed citations

6.

Nixon, Philip D. & Richard E. Passingham. (1998). The striatum and self-paced movements.. Behavioral Neuroscience. 112(3). 719–724. 10 indexed citations

7.

Rushworth, Matthew F. S., Philip D. Nixon, Derick T Wade, Shelley Renowden, & Richard E. Passingham. (1998). The left hemisphere and the selection of learned actions. Neuropsychologia. 36(1). 11–24. 88 indexed citations

8.

Nixon, Philip D. & Richard E. Passingham. (1998). The striatum and self-paced movements.. Behavioral Neuroscience. 112(3). 719–724. 10 indexed citations

9.

Rushworth, Matthew F. S., Philip D. Nixon, Madeline J. Eacott, & Richard E. Passingham. (1997). Ventral Prefrontal Cortex Is Not Essential for Working Memory. Journal of Neuroscience. 17(12). 4829–4838. 155 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact