Philip Choi

4.6k total citations
52 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Philip Choi is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Choi has authored 52 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 39 papers in Epidemiology, 19 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 18 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in Philip Choi's work include Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (36 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (18 papers) and Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (17 papers). Philip Choi is often cited by papers focused on Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (36 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (18 papers) and Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (17 papers). Philip Choi collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United States. Philip Choi's co-authors include Ruiwu Wang, Bailong Xiao, Lin Zhang, Dawei Jiang, Dongmei Yang, Heping Cheng, Huihui Kong, Bijoy K. Menon, Michael D. Hill and Andrew M. Demchuk and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Circulation Research.

In The Last Decade

Philip Choi

48 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Philip Choi Australia 13 645 582 500 370 169 52 1.3k
Teddy Y. Wu New Zealand 19 168 0.3× 168 0.3× 518 1.0× 174 0.5× 401 2.4× 69 1.0k
Benjamin Hotter Germany 16 43 0.1× 137 0.2× 372 0.7× 182 0.5× 291 1.7× 38 813
Alvin S. Das United States 15 163 0.3× 104 0.2× 492 1.0× 265 0.7× 407 2.4× 50 942
Shlee Song United States 15 143 0.2× 78 0.1× 447 0.9× 414 1.1× 250 1.5× 40 874
Markus Kneihsl Austria 16 140 0.2× 57 0.1× 420 0.8× 227 0.6× 304 1.8× 53 793
Alexander D. Horsch Netherlands 17 85 0.1× 59 0.1× 376 0.8× 304 0.8× 200 1.2× 30 738
Ichiro Deguchi Japan 14 224 0.3× 40 0.1× 279 0.6× 212 0.6× 219 1.3× 86 684
Janja Pretnar Oblak Slovenia 17 257 0.4× 53 0.1× 262 0.5× 245 0.7× 345 2.0× 66 915
Irene Escudero‐Martínez Spain 12 129 0.2× 72 0.1× 222 0.4× 87 0.2× 132 0.8× 38 535
Bastian Volbers Germany 21 97 0.2× 53 0.1× 675 1.4× 136 0.4× 919 5.4× 51 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Choi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Choi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Choi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Choi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Choi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Choi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Choi. The network helps show where Philip Choi may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Choi

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Choi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Choi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Choi. Philip Choi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
McCarthy, Josephine, et al.. (2025). Testing for Primary Aldosteronism Underutilized Following Stroke: A Multicenter Cohort Study. Stroke. 57(2). 493–498.
2.
Wu, Teddy Y., Henry Zhao, Leonid Churilov, et al.. (2025). Ultra-Early Hematoma Expansion Is Associated With Ongoing Hematoma Growth and Poor Functional Outcome. Stroke. 56(4). 838–847. 3 indexed citations
3.
Edwards, Leon, Cecilia Cappelen‐Smith, Dennis Cordato, et al.. (2025). A deep learning approach versus expert clinician panel in the classification of posterior circulation infarction. NeuroImage Clinical. 45. 103732–103732. 1 indexed citations
5.
Singh, Nishita, Carol Kenney, Kenneth Butcher, et al.. (2024). A Randomized Controlled Trial of Tenecteplase Versus Standard of Care for Minor Ischemic Stroke with Proven Occlusion (TEMPO-2): Rational and design of a multicenter, randomized open-label clinical trial. International Journal of Stroke. 19(7). 817–822. 1 indexed citations
6.
7.
Lin, Longting, Christopher Blair, James C. Fu, et al.. (2023). Prior anticoagulation and bridging thrombolysis improve outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing endovascular thrombectomy for anterior circulation stroke. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery. 15(e3). e433–e437. 5 indexed citations
8.
Frost, Tanya, et al.. (2022). Trends in direct oral anticoagulant use in patients presenting with acute stroke. Internal Medicine Journal. 52(9). 1633–1637. 2 indexed citations
9.
García-Esperón, Carlos, Andrew Bivard, Hannah Johns, et al.. (2022). Association of Endovascular Thrombectomy With Functional Outcome in Patients With Acute Stroke With a Large Ischemic Core. Neurology. 99(13). e1345–e1355. 12 indexed citations
10.
Roy, Anil, et al.. (2021). Meta-analysis on the treatment options and outcomes of carotid blood blister aneurysms. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 92. 147–152. 5 indexed citations
11.
Chen, Chushuang, Mark Parsons, Christopher Levi, et al.. (2021). What Is the “Optimal” Target Mismatch Criteria for Acute Ischemic Stroke?. Frontiers in Neurology. 11. 590766–590766. 4 indexed citations
12.
Gao, Lan, Andrew Bivard, Mark Parsons, et al.. (2021). Real-World Cost-Effectiveness of Late Time Window Thrombectomy for Patients With Ischemic Stroke. Frontiers in Neurology. 12. 780894–780894. 5 indexed citations
14.
Gao, Lan, Marj Moodie, Mark Parsons, et al.. (2020). Reduced Impact of Endovascular Thrombectomy on Disability in Real-World Practice, Relative to Randomized Controlled Trial Evidence in Australia. Frontiers in Neurology. 11. 593238–593238. 5 indexed citations
15.
Bivard, Andrew, Timothy Kleinig, Leonid Churilov, et al.. (2020). Permeability Measures Predict Hemorrhagic Transformation after Ischemic Stroke. Annals of Neurology. 88(3). 466–476. 27 indexed citations
16.
Zhang, Wen-wen, Skye Coote, Tanya Frost, Helen M. Dewey, & Philip Choi. (2019). Reliability of the Acutely Estimated Premorbid Modified Rankin Scale for Stroke Treatment Decision Making. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases. 28(4). 1022–1026. 4 indexed citations
17.
Zhang, Wenwen, Skye Coote, Tanya Frost, Helen M. Dewey, & Philip Choi. (2018). Acute Stroke Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Pre-existing Disability Should Be Considered for Thrombolysis Treatment. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases. 27(10). 2707–2711. 10 indexed citations
18.
Ng, Felix, et al.. (2016). Time-Resolved 4-Dimensional Computed-Tomography Angiography Can Correctly Identify Carotid Pseudo-Occlusion. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases. 25(4). 1005–1006. 3 indexed citations
19.
Dubuc, Véronique, Philip Choi, Michael D. Hill, & Shelagh B. Coutts. (2015). Can 90-Day NIHSS Be Used for Outcome Assessment in TIA and Minor Stroke Studies?. Cerebrovascular Diseases. 40(1-2). 97–98. 3 indexed citations
20.
Choi, Philip, Velandai Srikanth, & Thanh G. Phan. (2011). ‘Fogging’ resulting in normal MRI 3 weeks after ischaemic stroke: Figure 1. BMJ Case Reports. 2011. bcr0420114110–bcr0420114110. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026