Philip Chen

9.4k citations
174 papers · 6.0k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 46

Impact in

Papers in

Philip Chen

169 papers receiving 5.8k citations

Hit Papers

Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Preferred Practice Pattern® 2020 · 221 citations
221202020262022202450100150200

Peers

Philip Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 167
  • Ophthalmology 3.4k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 2.6k
  • Cancer Research 593
  • Oncology 774
  • Molecular Biology 1.8k
Replace Yong Zeng with:
Yong Zeng China
Koïchi Shimizu Japan
Quan Dong Nguyen United States
Anselm Kampik Germany
Stephen R. Russell United States
Siegfried Priglinger Germany
Philip J. Rosenfeld United States
Jennifer I. Lim United States
Pascale Massin France
Philip Chen relative to Yong Zeng China Yong Zeng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Yong Zeng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Chen. The network helps show where Philip Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Chen Line = papers co-authored together Philip Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 174 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006222
2
Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Preferred Practice Pattern®
Hit paper breakdown →
2020221
3 2017177
4 2015170
5 2004161
6 2010158
7 2007154
8 2002143
9 2000134
10 2011130
11 1997123
12 1996120
13 2003114
14 2016112
15 1996112
16 2016111
17 2002102
18 2019100
19 200495
20 199895

About Philip Chen

Philip Chen is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cancer Research, Anatomy and Oncology, having authored 174 papers that have together received 6.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (88 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (43 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (36 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (23 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (23 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (14 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (12 papers) and Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (3.4k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (2.6k citations), Cancer Research (593 citations), Oncology (774 citations) and Molecular Biology (1.8k citations). Philip Chen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and China. Frequent co-authors include Martin F. Lavin, Karine D. Bojikian, Sergei Kozlov, Richard Parrish, Teresa C. Chen, William J. Feuer, Joanne C. Wen, Anna K. Junk, Steven J. Gedde and Shaun P. Scott. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Glaucoma, Ophthalmology, American Journal of Ophthalmology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and Journal of Biological Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026