Philip C. Watkins
- Social Psychology top 0.5%
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- Russell L. KoltsDonald A. WilliamsonAndrew MathewsRobert A. EmmonsJeffrey J. FrohL. Rebecca PropstDavid N. MashburnRicardo Fuller
- Topics
- Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (14 papers)Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (6 papers)Emotions and Moral Behavior (5 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical PsychologyJournal of Abnormal PsychologyJournal of Affective Disorders
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Philip C. Watkins
37 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
- Social Psychology 1.5k
- Clinical Psychology 1.2k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 475
- Cognitive Neuroscience 447
- Sociology and Political Science 411
Countries citing papers authored by Philip C. Watkins
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip C. Watkins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip C. Watkins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip C. Watkins more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip C. Watkins
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip C. Watkins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip C. Watkins. The network helps show where Philip C. Watkins may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip C. Watkins
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip C. Watkins. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip C. Watkins based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip C. Watkins. Philip C. Watkins is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 139 | |
| 10 | 195 | |
| 11 | 63 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 77 | |
| 15 | 63 | |
| 16 | 66 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 144 | |
| 19 | 215 | |
| 20 | 16 |
About Philip C. Watkins
Philip C. Watkins is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Applied Psychology and Health, having authored 40 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (14 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (6 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (1.5k citations), Applied Psychology (342 citations) and Clinical Psychology (1.2k citations). Philip C. Watkins has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Russell L. Kolts, Donald A. Williamson, Andrew Mathews, Robert A. Emmons, Jeffrey J. Froh, L. Rebecca Propst, David N. Mashburn, Ricardo Fuller, A Mathews and Steven P. Verney. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Journal of Abnormal Psychology and Journal of Affective Disorders.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.