Philip C. Jones

2.4k total citations
70 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Philip C. Jones is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip C. Jones has authored 70 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Management Information Systems, 19 papers in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and 16 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Philip C. Jones's work include Supply Chain and Inventory Management (18 papers), Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms (11 papers) and Economic theories and models (11 papers). Philip C. Jones is often cited by papers focused on Supply Chain and Inventory Management (18 papers), Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms (11 papers) and Economic theories and models (11 papers). Philip C. Jones collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Poland. Philip C. Jones's co-authors include Ann Melissa Campbell, Timothy J. Lowe, James L. Zydiak, Wallace J. Hopp, Robert R. Inman, F. A. Skinner, Rodney D. Traub, Lyn Healy, Sylvie Delassus and John W. Brown and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Cell and Blood.

In The Last Decade

Philip C. Jones

68 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Philip C. Jones
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • Management Information Systems 343
  • Molecular Biology 303
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 298
  • Strategy and Management 203
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 203
Replace Shaomin Wu with:
Shaomin Wu United Kingdom
Mostafa Karimi Iran
A.P.J. Vepsäläinen Finland
Robert A. Russell United States
Wai Peng Wong Singapore
Guiping Hu United States
Fan Wang China
Éric Ballot France
Jin Peng China
Flavio Tonelli Italy
Shaomin Wu United Kingdom View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Philip C. Jones
Philip C. Jones · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Philip C. Jones
Philip C. Jones · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Philip C. Jones

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip C. Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip C. Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip C. Jones more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip C. Jones

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip C. Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip C. Jones. The network helps show where Philip C. Jones may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip C. Jones

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip C. Jones. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip C. Jones based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip C. Jones. Philip C. Jones is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 22
2 22
3 0
4 57
5
Matching Supply and Demand: The Value of a Second Chance in Producing Seed Corn
2
6 44
7 23
8 1
9 2
10 8
11 2
12 27
13
Training for manufacturing
4
14 64
15 28
16 0
17 1
18 38
19 3
20 1

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026