Philip C. Doyle

119 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Philip C. Doyle
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Otorhinolaryngology 182
  • Speech and Hearing 208
  • Physiology 704
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 174
  • Occupational Therapy 33
Replace Barbara H. Jacobson with:
Barbara H. Jacobson United States
Ann W. Kummer United States
Nina L. Shapiro United States
James A. Burns United States
Meredydd Harries United Kingdom
Kenneth MacKenzie United Kingdom
Scott E. Brietzke United States
Paul Carding United Kingdom
Cláudia Regina Furquim de Andrade Brazil
Byron J. Bailey United States
Philip C. Doyle relative to Barbara H. Jacobson United States Barbara H. Jacobson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Barbara H. Jacobson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip C. Doyle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip C. Doyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip C. Doyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip C. Doyle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip C. Doyle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip C. Doyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip C. Doyle. The network helps show where Philip C. Doyle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip C. Doyle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip C. Doyle Line = papers co-authored together Philip C. Doyle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 128 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013107
2 2005104
3 200254
4 201053
5 200446
6 200246
7
Evaluation of a three-dimensional educational computer model of the larynx: voicing a new direction.
201046
8 198842
9 201239
10 201439
11 199838
12 200635
13 201533
14 198733
15
Foundations of Voice and Speech Rehabilitation Following Laryngeal Cancer
199433
16 199032
17 201132
18 202030
19 200630
20 201228

About Philip C. Doyle

Philip C. Doyle is a scholar working on Physiology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Speech and Hearing and Surgery, having authored 128 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Voice and Speech Disorders (51 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (20 papers), Dysphagia Assessment and Management (13 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (10 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (8 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (7 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (7 papers) and Surgical Simulation and Training (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (182 citations), Speech and Hearing (208 citations), Physiology (704 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (174 citations) and Occupational Therapy (33 citations). Philip C. Doyle has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Tanya L. Eadie, C J Martin, Kevin Fung, Michael G. Brandt, Julie Theurer, Jason Franklin, Hanif M. Ladak, Steven R. Cox, John Yoo and Jeffrey L. Danhauer. Their work appears in journals such as Otolaryngology, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Journal of Voice, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and The Laryngoscope.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact