Philip Allcock
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Materials Chemistry
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry top 10%
- Co-authors
- Davıd L. AndrewsP. A. SnowRobert D. JenkinsC.L. ReevesJillian M. BuriakMark AndersonMichael StewartLeigh Canham
- Topics
- Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (9 papers)Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (8 papers)Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Philip Allcock
14 papers receiving 420 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 269
- Biomedical Engineering 153
- Materials Chemistry 150
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 120
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 72
Countries citing papers authored by Philip Allcock
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Allcock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Allcock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Allcock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Allcock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Allcock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Allcock. The network helps show where Philip Allcock may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Allcock
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Allcock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Allcock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Allcock. Philip Allcock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 41 | |
| 2 | 68 | |
| 3 | Optical Harmonics in Molecular Systems: Quantum Electrodynamical Theory | 47 |
| 4 | 32 | |
| 5 | 76 | |
| 6 | 37 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 26 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | 31 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 6 |
About Philip Allcock
Philip Allcock is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Biophysics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 15 papers that have together received 434 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (9 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (8 papers) and Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (269 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (72 citations) and Biophysics (25 citations). Philip Allcock has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Davıd L. Andrews, P. A. Snow, Robert D. Jenkins, C.L. Reeves, Jillian M. Buriak, Mark Anderson, Michael Stewart, Leigh Canham, E.K. Squire and А. А. Демидов. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Society Reviews, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Journal of Applied Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.