Philip Alexander

1.7k citations
76 papers · 979 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Philip Alexander

73 papers receiving 950 citations

Peers

Philip Alexander
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Ophthalmology 255
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 202
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 194
  • Instrumentation 28
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 82
Replace Nicola G. Ghazi with:
Nicola G. Ghazi United States
David W. Richards United States
P Rasmussen Denmark
John Day United States
John A. Dixon United States
Michihiro Suzuki Japan
T. Hassan United States
Michael F. Moyers United States
Ganna Aleshcheva Germany
Raffaele Liuzzi Italy
Philip Alexander relative to Nicola G. Ghazi United States Nicola G. Ghazi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Nicola G. Ghazi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Alexander

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Alexander's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Alexander with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Alexander more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Alexander

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Alexander. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Alexander. The network helps show where Philip Alexander may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Alexander, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Alexander Line = papers co-authored together Philip Alexander links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020112
2 201553
3 201648
4 200643
5 201037
6 201935
7 200828
8 201226
9 199325
10 199825
11
Complement factor I and age-related macular degeneration.
201425
12 201824
13 202121
14 201121
15 202220
16 201219
17 199919
18 202118
19 200416
20 202016

About Philip Alexander

Philip Alexander is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Ophthalmology, Genetics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 76 papers that have together received 979 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal and Macular Surgery (16 papers), Connective tissue disorders research (11 papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (11 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (8 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (7 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (7 papers), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (7 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (255 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (202 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (194 citations), Instrumentation (28 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (82 citations). Philip Alexander has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Martin P. Snead, David A. Green, M. S. Clemens, Allan J. Richards, Annie McNinch, Asif K. Mustafa, Antone Tatooles, P. Pappas, Andrew Lotery and Devang J. Joshi. Their work appears in journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Eye, Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, Genes and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact