Philip Adams

9 total papers · 621 total citations
8 papers, 430 citations indexed

About

Philip Adams is a scholar working on Genetics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Adams has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 430 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Genetics, 4 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 3 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Philip Adams's work include Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (5 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (3 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers). Philip Adams is often cited by papers focused on Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (5 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (3 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers). Philip Adams collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Philip Adams's co-authors include Myrna M. Weissman, Raymond R. Crowe, Kathleen P. Murphy-Eberenz, Melvin G. McInnis, J. Raymond DePaulo, Erin B. Miller, Douglas F. Levinson, William A. Scheftner, Peter Holmans and Dean F. MacKinnon and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Biological Psychiatry and The American Journal of Human Genetics.

In The Last Decade

Philip Adams

8 papers receiving 420 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Philip Adams 154 135 103 80 71 8 430
Dubravka Jancic 91 0.6× 140 1.0× 75 0.7× 40 0.5× 126 1.8× 11 446
Niels Bergemann 79 0.5× 84 0.6× 91 0.9× 76 0.9× 128 1.8× 11 450
D. Nahon 127 0.8× 67 0.5× 56 0.5× 38 0.5× 206 2.9× 11 459
Sheila Shanmugan 112 0.7× 56 0.4× 83 0.8× 106 1.3× 111 1.6× 14 445
Jessica L. Bar 91 0.6× 68 0.5× 26 0.3× 57 0.7× 93 1.3× 6 465
Dongsha Wang 161 1.0× 62 0.5× 52 0.5× 31 0.4× 50 0.7× 5 491
M. Lang 88 0.6× 76 0.6× 46 0.4× 25 0.3× 210 3.0× 7 411
Jean Endicott 94 0.6× 153 1.1× 51 0.5× 39 0.5× 263 3.7× 10 495
T. Rolfe 95 0.6× 71 0.5× 33 0.3× 67 0.8× 271 3.8× 12 474
Liis Merenäkk 164 1.1× 28 0.2× 43 0.4× 54 0.7× 66 0.9× 15 410

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Adams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Adams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Adams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Adams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Adams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Adams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Adams. The network helps show where Philip Adams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Adams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Adams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Adams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Adams. Philip Adams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026