Philip A. Harland
- Religious studies top 0.5%
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation 14
- Archeology top 2%
- Archaeology and Historical Studies 15
- Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History 6
- Ancient Egypt and Archaeology 4
- Anthropology top 5%
- Classical Antiquity Studies 5
-
- Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents 2
-
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis 2
-
- Historical and Linguistic Studies 4
- Co-authors
- Michael KalerRichard J. StoodleyRamesh C. GuptaPhilip HodgeJohn S. KloppenborgRichard S. AscoughKaren L. KingE. Brugman
- Journals
- Journal of Biblical Literature (3 papers)Synthesis (3 papers)Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited KingdomGhana
In The Last Decade
Philip A. Harland
30 papers receiving 232 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Religious studies 126
- Archeology 111
- Anthropology 76
- Toxicology 17
- Organic Chemistry 94
Countries citing papers authored by Philip A. Harland
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip A. Harland's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip A. Harland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip A. Harland more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip A. Harland
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip A. Harland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip A. Harland. The network helps show where Philip A. Harland may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Philip A. Harland, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 5 | "What is an author?" Ancient author-function in the Apocryphon of John and the Apocalypse of John | 2016 | 1 |
| 6 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 26 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2004 | 60 | |
| 14 | Vroegtijdige opsporing van psychosociale problematiek door de jeugdgezondheidszorg bij schoolgaande jeugd | 2003 | 1 |
| 15 | 2003 | 6 | |
| 16 | 1996 | 7 | |
| 17 | 1984 | 23 | |
| 18 | 1984 | 45 | |
| 19 | 1983 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1982 | 15 |
About Philip A. Harland
Philip A. Harland is a scholar working on Religious studies, Archeology, Toxicology, Classics and Anthropology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 302 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Archaeology and Historical Studies (15 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (14 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (6 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (5 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (4 papers), Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (4 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (2 papers) and Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (126 citations), Archeology (111 citations), Anthropology (76 citations), Toxicology (17 citations) and Organic Chemistry (94 citations). Philip A. Harland has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Ghana. Frequent co-authors include Michael Kaler, Richard J. Stoodley, Ramesh C. Gupta, Philip Hodge, John S. Kloppenborg, Richard S. Ascough, Karen L. King, E. Brugman, Frank C. Verhulst and A.G.C. Vogels. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biblical Literature, Synthesis, Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses, Journal for the Study of the New Testament and Tetrahedron.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.