Phil Gregory
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Astro and Planetary Science
- Instrumentation top 10%
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Papers in
- Ecology 2
- Avian ecology and behavior 2
- Rangeland and Wildlife Management 1
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 2
- Journals
- New Writing (1 paper)The Wilson Journal of Ornithology (1 paper)PubMed (1 paper)Cambridge University Press eBooks (1 paper)Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Phil Gregory
7 papers receiving 486 citations
Phil Gregory's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 251
- Instrumentation 43
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 53
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 27
- Ecological Modeling 15
Countries citing papers authored by Phil Gregory
This map shows the geographic impact of Phil Gregory's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phil Gregory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phil Gregory more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Phil Gregory
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phil Gregory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phil Gregory. The network helps show where Phil Gregory may publish in the future.
No co-authors to show.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bayesian Logical Data Analysis for the Physical Sciences Hit paper breakdown → | 2005 | 469 |
| 2 | 2007 | 12 | |
| 3 | Birds of New Guinea: Including Bismarck Archipelago and Bougainville | 2017 | 12 |
| 4 | Correlating motion palpation with functional x-ray findings in patients with low back pain. | 1998 | 4 |
| 5 | Movement of diseases between neighbouring states: some South American examples | 1979 | 1 |
| 6 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1994 | 1 |
About Phil Gregory
Phil Gregory is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecological Modeling, Pharmacology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Cell Biology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 500 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Species Distribution and Climate Change (2 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (2 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (1 paper), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (1 paper), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (1 paper), Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (1 paper), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (1 paper) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (251 citations), Instrumentation (43 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (53 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (27 citations) and Ecological Modeling (15 citations). Phil Gregory has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Australia. Their work appears in journals such as New Writing, The Wilson Journal of Ornithology, PubMed, Cambridge University Press eBooks and Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.