Phil Bach

1.0k citations
24 papers · 678 indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Phil Bach

22 papers receiving 669 citations

Hit Papers

Spermatogenesis in humans and its affecting factors 2016 · 358 citations
3580+3+6Years since publication100200300

Peers

Phil Bach
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Reproductive Medicine 406
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 253
  • Genetics 166
  • Urology 33
  • Molecular Biology 244
Replace Haitham Elbardisi with:
Haitham Elbardisi Qatar
Filipe Tenório Lira Neto Brazil
Mariana Camargo Brazil
Emma James United States
Paula Intasqui Brazil
Saad Elzanaty Sweden
P.T. Del Giudice Brazil
Carlos Abad Spain
Agustín García-Peiró Spain
Olev Poolamets Estonia
Phil Bach relative to Haitham Elbardisi Qatar Haitham Elbardisi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Haitham Elbardisi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phil Bach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phil Bach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phil Bach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phil Bach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phil Bach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phil Bach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phil Bach. The network helps show where Phil Bach may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phil Bach, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phil Bach Line = papers co-authored together Phil Bach links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Spermatogenesis in humans and its affecting factors
Hit paper breakdown →
2016358
2 201780
3 201661
4 201632
5 201230
6 201622
7 202119
8 201414
9 201810
10 20218
11 20197
12 20236
13 20196
14 20206
15 20205
16 20204
17 20242
18 20192
19 20192
20 20071

About Phil Bach

Phil Bach is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Molecular Biology, Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Rheumatology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 678 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sperm and Testicular Function (11 papers), Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (7 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (7 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (7 papers), Urologic and reproductive health conditions (4 papers), Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (3 papers), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (3 papers) and Genital Health and Disease (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (406 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (253 citations), Genetics (166 citations), Urology (33 citations) and Molecular Biology (244 citations). Phil Bach has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Marc Goldstein, Bobby B. Najari, Filipe Tenório Lira Neto, Philip S. Li, Peter N. Schlegel, Ryan Flannigan, Keith Rourke, Ahmed Almalki, Armand Zini and Richard N. Fedorak. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Sexual Medicine, The Journal of Urology, Fertility and Sterility, Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology and Urology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact