P.H. Rebut

1.5k citations
41 papers · 932 indexed · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

P.H. Rebut

39 papers receiving 869 citations

Peers

P.H. Rebut
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 808
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 316
  • Aerospace Engineering 230
  • Materials Chemistry 431
  • Radiation 56
Replace M.L. Watkins with:
M.L. Watkins United Kingdom
O. Mitarai Japan
V. Mukhovatov Germany
S. Putvinski United States
G. Martín France
D. Garnier United States
D. Heifetz United States
K. Yamazaki Japan
M. Shoji Japan
F. Rimini United Kingdom
P.H. Rebut relative to M.L. Watkins United Kingdom M.L. Watkins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
M.L. Watkins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by P.H. Rebut

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P.H. Rebut's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P.H. Rebut with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P.H. Rebut more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P.H. Rebut

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P.H. Rebut. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P.H. Rebut. The network helps show where P.H. Rebut may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside P.H. Rebut, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with P.H. Rebut Line = papers co-authored together P.H. Rebut links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201710
2
REFLECTIONS ON FUSION.FUTURE
19962
3
ITER Tritium Breeding Blanket Design
19951
4 199510
5
The ITER EDA outline design
19955
6 19954
7 199516
8 1992155
9 199244
10 19912
11 199132
12 19903
13 19898
14 19871
15 198644
16 19846
17
Cryopumps for JET - design of a large scale system of open configuration for high specific pumping speed
19812
18 19634
19 19636
20 196217

About P.H. Rebut

P.H. Rebut is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, Aerospace Engineering and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 41 papers that have together received 932 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (31 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (25 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (18 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (6 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (5 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (5 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (4 papers) and Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (808 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (316 citations), Aerospace Engineering (230 citations), Materials Chemistry (431 citations) and Radiation (56 citations). P.H. Rebut has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include B.E. Keen, R.J. Bickerton, M.L. Watkins, D. Boucher, D.J. Gambier, M. Hugon, M. Brusati, C. Gormezano, J. Jacquinot and M. Keilhacker. Their work appears in journals such as Fusion Engineering and Design, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Nuclear Fusion, Journal of Nuclear Materials and Fusion Science & Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026