Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review
2012890 citationsRoland Sigrist, Georg Rauter et al.Psychonomic Bulletin & Reviewprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Wolf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Wolf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Wolf more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Wolf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Wolf. The network helps show where Peter Wolf may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Wolf
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Wolf.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Wolf based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Wolf. Peter Wolf is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Sigrist, Roland, Georg Rauter, Robert Riener, & Peter Wolf. (2012). Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 20(1). 21–53.890 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Wolf, Peter, Andreas Schmidt, & Michael Klein. (2009). Applying Semantic Technologies for Context-Aware AAL Services: What we can learn from SOPRANO.. 3077–3090.10 indexed citations
12.
Wolf, Peter, et al.. (2008). Transmissions Within the Tarsal Gearbox. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association. 98(1). 45–50.4 indexed citations
Wolf, Peter, et al.. (2007). Using Driving Simulators to Train Snowplow Operators: Lessons Learned from Some Preliminary Evaluations. Transportation Research Board 86th Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board.1 indexed citations
15.
Baecker, Ron, et al.. (2004). The ePresence Interactive Webcasting and Archiving System: Technology Overview and Current Research Issues. E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. 2004(1). 2532–2537.6 indexed citations
16.
Baecker, Ron, et al.. (2004). ePresence: An Open Source Interactive Webcasting and Archiving System for eLearning. E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. 2004(1). 2888–2893.3 indexed citations
Cox, David A., J. C. R. Hunt, Paul M. Mason, H. S. Wheater, & Peter Wolf. (2002). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences: 360 (1796). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences. 360(1796).1 indexed citations
19.
Löschner, H., et al.. (1993). Ion projection lithography for vacuum microelectronics. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures Processing Measurement and Phenomena. 11(2). 487–492.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.