Peter White

2.2k citations
45 papers · 1.6k indexed · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Peter White

43 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Peter White
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 897
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 582
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 327
  • Pharmacology 329
  • Cell Biology 167
Replace Rene Hawkes with:
Rene Hawkes United States
WU Tai-xiang China
SN Willich Germany
Maria Hondras United States
Matthew D. Jones Australia
Ronald M. Glick United States
Peter Aker Canada
Alan H. Adams United States
Marion McGregor United States
Richard C. Niemtzow United States
Peter White relative to Rene Hawkes United States Rene Hawkes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Rene Hawkes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter White

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter White's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter White with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter White more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter White

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter White. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter White. The network helps show where Peter White may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter White, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter White Line = papers co-authored together Peter White links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20198
2 20185
3 20163
4 20168
5 20163
6 20168
7 201183
8 201117
9 201122
10 201076
11 200866
12 200710
13
Acupuncture and its use in chronic musculoskeletal pain
20060
14
Erleichtern Neuroimaging-Verfahren das Verständnis klinischer Akupunktureffekte?
20064
15 20065
16 200636
17
Response to letter. Acupuncture for chronic mechanical neck pain
20051
18 200455
19 2003179
20 200228

About Peter White

Peter White is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Anatomy and Pharmacology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (27 papers), Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (26 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (23 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (9 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (8 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (6 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (4 papers) and Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (897 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (582 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (327 citations), Pharmacology (329 citations) and Cell Biology (167 citations). Peter White has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include George Lewith, P. Prescott, Jérémie Pariente, Alan Tennant, Paula Kersten, R. S. J. Frackowiak, Val Hopwood, Joy Conway, Paul Little and Felicity L. Bishop. Their work appears in journals such as Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Pain, Acupuncture in Medicine, Clinical Journal of Pain and British Journal of General Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026