Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Federated Learning for Healthcare Informatics
2020821 citationsPeter Walker et al.PubMedprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Walker more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Walker. The network helps show where Peter Walker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Walker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Walker.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Walker based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Walker. Peter Walker is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Shepherd, Paul, et al.. (2017). Form-Fitting Strategies for Diversity-Tolerant Design. The University of Bath Online Publications Store (The University of Bath). 1.13 indexed citations
Heath, Andrew, et al.. (2012). Modern earth masonry:Structural properties and structural design. The University of Bath Online Publications Store (The University of Bath). 90(4). 38–44.18 indexed citations
7.
Walker, Peter, et al.. (2012). Creating OGC Web Processing Service workflows using a web-based editor. EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. 5734.1 indexed citations
8.
Nicolas, Jérôme, et al.. (2011). Enterprise Risk Management: A process for enhanced management and improved performance. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).49 indexed citations
Walker, Peter, et al.. (2008). The structural performance of traditional oak tension and scarf joints. The University of Bath Online Publications Store (The University of Bath).7 indexed citations
11.
Goodhew, Steve, et al.. (2008). Totnes Eco House: interaction between design and in-situ monitoring. Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository).
12.
Walker, Peter, et al.. (2006). Lateral strength of green oak frames: physical testing and modelling. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).1 indexed citations
13.
Walker, Peter, et al.. (2005). Experimental performance of mortice and tenon connections in green oak. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).11 indexed citations
14.
Walker, Peter. (2000). Experimental studies on the compressive strength testing of compressed earth blocks. Psychiatric Annals. 18(10). 571–6.1 indexed citations
15.
Walker, Peter. (1997). MEASUREMENT OF TOTAL SUCTION AND MATRIC SUCTION IN PAVEMENT MATERIALS AT DANDENONG ALF SITE. Road and transport research. 6(4). 48–58.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.