Peter W. Cains

1.3k citations
25 papers · 1.1k · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Peter W. Cains

24 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Peter W. Cains
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 304
  • Materials Chemistry 701
  • Filtration and Separation 21
  • Pharmaceutical Science 53
  • Biomaterials 110
Replace P T Cardew with:
P T Cardew United Kingdom
Nicolas Fatin‐Rouge France
J. Böck United States
Ireneusz Janik United States
Juha Kallas Finland
Maja Ponikvar‐Svet Slovenia
Drew Myers France
Shyam Vyas United States
Tu Lee Taiwan
Mohamed Aoudia Oman
Peter W. Cains relative to P T Cardew United Kingdom P T Cardew's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
P T Cardew · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter W. Cains

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter W. Cains's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter W. Cains with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter W. Cains more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter W. Cains

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter W. Cains. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter W. Cains. The network helps show where Peter W. Cains may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter W. Cains, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter W. Cains Line = papers co-authored together Peter W. Cains links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005310
2 2009140
3 2008122
4 199888
5 199779
6 201170
7 200741
8
Use the power of sonocrystallization for improved properties
200140
9 200827
10 199423
11 197820
12 200419
13 199219
14 200614
15 199713
16 199711
17 199410
18 199110
19 20017
20 19974

About Peter W. Cains

Peter W. Cains is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Biomedical Engineering and Inorganic Chemistry, having authored 25 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crystallization and Solubility Studies (10 papers), Crystallography and molecular interactions (6 papers), Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena (5 papers), Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (4 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (3 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (3 papers), Recycling and Waste Management Techniques (2 papers) and Industrial Gas Emission Control (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (304 citations), Materials Chemistry (701 citations), Filtration and Separation (21 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (53 citations) and Biomaterials (110 citations). Peter W. Cains has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Joop H. ter Horst, Tuan Q. Ly, Graham Ruecroft, M. A. Deij, Christopher J. Price, P. Dyke, Alwyn Fernandes, G.H. Eduljee, Herman J. M. Kramer and Mihaela M. Pop. Their work appears in journals such as Crystal Growth & Design, Chemosphere, Organic Process Research & Development, Chemical engineering progress and SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact