Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Corporate governance, accounting and finance: A review
2010477 citationsPeter Verhoeven et al.Accounting and Financeprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Verhoeven
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Verhoeven's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Verhoeven with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Verhoeven more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Verhoeven. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Verhoeven. The network helps show where Peter Verhoeven may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Verhoeven
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Verhoeven.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Verhoeven based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Verhoeven. Peter Verhoeven is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Wahab, Effiezal Aswadi Abdul, Janice C. Y. How, Jason Y. Park, & Peter Verhoeven. (2018). Political patronage and analysts’ forecast precision. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics. 14(3). 307–320.8 indexed citations
10.
Hutchinson, Marion, Janet Mack, & Peter Verhoeven. (2017). Women in leadership: An analysis of the gender pay gap in ASX-listed firms. QUT Business School.1 indexed citations
11.
How, Janice C. Y., et al.. (2017). Taking a leap of faith: are investors left short changed?. Chapters. 533–558.1 indexed citations
12.
How, Janice C. Y., et al.. (2013). Corporate Ownership, Corporate Governance Reform and Timeliness of Earnings: Malaysian Evidence. SSRN Electronic Journal.
13.
James, Kieran, Janice C. Y. How, & Peter Verhoeven. (2011). ON THE ALLOCATION OF A TAKEOVER PURCHASE PRICE UNDER AASB1013. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance. 7(2). 1–34.1 indexed citations
14.
Wahab, Effiezal Aswadi Abdul, Janice C. Y. How, & Peter Verhoeven. (2008). Corporate Governance and Institutional Investors: Evidence from Malaysia. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance. 4(2). 67–90.51 indexed citations
15.
How, Janice C. Y., et al.. (2008). Did the goodwill accounting standard impose material economic consequences on Australian acquirers. QUT Business School.2 indexed citations
16.
How, Janice C. Y., et al.. (2008). Dividends and Expropriation in Hong Kong. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance. 4(1). 71–85.21 indexed citations
How, Janice C. Y., et al.. (2005). ACCURACY OF ANALYSTS' EARNINGS FORECASTS: EVIDENCE FROM MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS IN AUSTRALIA. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance. 1(1). 67–80.
19.
Verhoeven, Peter & Michael McAleer. (2003). Fat Tails and Asymmetry in Financial Volatility Models. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.4 indexed citations
20.
Verhoeven, Peter & Michael McAleer. (2001). Non-linear Modelling and Asymmetries in Conditional Volatility. UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.