Peter Stippl

649 total citations
17 papers, 350 citations indexed

About

Peter Stippl is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Stippl has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 350 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Clinical Psychology, 12 papers in Applied Psychology and 6 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Peter Stippl's work include COVID-19 and Mental Health (13 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (12 papers) and Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (6 papers). Peter Stippl is often cited by papers focused on COVID-19 and Mental Health (13 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (12 papers) and Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (6 papers). Peter Stippl collaborates with scholars based in Austria, Germany and Czechia. Peter Stippl's co-authors include Thomas Probst, Christoph Pieh, Elke Humer, Rüdiger Pryss, Rachel Dale, Sanja Budimir, Andrea Jesser, Bettina K. Doering, Antonia Barke and Michael Stadler and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Frontiers in Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Peter Stippl

16 papers receiving 332 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peter Stippl Austria 9 261 170 133 74 55 17 350
Nelle Williams United States 3 154 0.6× 155 0.9× 152 1.1× 60 0.8× 53 1.0× 3 289
Milou A. Feijt Netherlands 6 138 0.5× 194 1.1× 114 0.9× 82 1.1× 77 1.4× 13 328
Fanny Kählke Germany 10 162 0.6× 215 1.3× 40 0.3× 89 1.2× 61 1.1× 16 349
Andrea Jesser Austria 10 205 0.8× 85 0.5× 49 0.4× 58 0.8× 58 1.1× 31 276
Evgenia Milman United States 10 370 1.4× 30 0.2× 93 0.7× 89 1.2× 109 2.0× 19 416
Murat Pakyürek United States 7 77 0.3× 77 0.5× 113 0.8× 22 0.3× 54 1.0× 12 226
Alexandra Godinho Canada 11 139 0.5× 105 0.6× 27 0.2× 27 0.4× 58 1.1× 36 305
Marios Argyrides Cyprus 11 296 1.1× 37 0.2× 100 0.8× 46 0.6× 22 0.4× 42 386
Matthew J. Savage United Kingdom 4 249 1.0× 42 0.2× 21 0.2× 117 1.6× 93 1.7× 12 336
Hossein Souri Iran 6 142 0.5× 71 0.4× 25 0.2× 82 1.1× 38 0.7× 9 270

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Stippl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Stippl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Stippl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Stippl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Stippl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Stippl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Stippl. The network helps show where Peter Stippl may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Stippl

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Stippl. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Stippl based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Stippl. Peter Stippl is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Stadler, Michael, Andrea Jesser, Elke Humer, et al.. (2023). Remote Psychotherapy during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Study on the Changes Experienced by Austrian Psychotherapists. Life. 13(2). 360–360. 6 indexed citations
2.
Barke, Antonia, Bettina K. Doering, Natália Kaščáková, et al.. (2022). Psychotherapists’ Reports regarding the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Their Patients: A Cross-National Descriptive Study Based on the Social-Ecological Model (SEM). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19(11). 6825–6825. 3 indexed citations
3.
Probst, Thomas, et al.. (2022). Perceived Barriers and Facilitators to Psychotherapy Utilisation and How They Relate to Patient’s Psychotherapeutic Goals. Healthcare. 10(11). 2228–2228. 10 indexed citations
4.
Nußbaumer-Streit, Barbara, Andrea Jesser, Elke Humer, et al.. (2022). A web-survey assessed attitudes toward evidence-based practice among psychotherapists in Austria. Scientific Reports. 12(1). 9374–9374. 6 indexed citations
5.
Dale, Rachel, Sanja Budimir, Thomas Probst, Peter Stippl, & Christoph Pieh. (2021). Mental Health during the COVID-19 Lockdown over the Christmas Period in Austria and the Effects of Sociodemographic and Lifestyle Factors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 18(7). 3679–3679. 47 indexed citations
6.
Humer, Elke, et al.. (2021). Provision of Psychotherapy One Year after the Beginning of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Austria. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 18(11). 5843–5843. 8 indexed citations
9.
Dale, Rachel, Sanja Budimir, Thomas Probst, Peter Stippl, & Christoph Pieh. (2021). Mental Health during a COVID-19 Lockdown Over the Christmas Period in Austria. SSRN Electronic Journal. 22 indexed citations
10.
Probst, Thomas, et al.. (2021). Psychotherapie auf Distanz in Österreich während COVID‑19. Zusammenfassung der bisher publizierten Ergebnisse von drei Onlinebefragungen. Psychotherapie Forum. 25(1-2). 30–36. 1 indexed citations
11.
Humer, Elke, et al.. (2020). Psychotherapy via the Internet: What Programs Do Psychotherapists Use, How Well-Informed Do They Feel, and What Are Their Wishes for Continuous Education?. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 17(21). 8182–8182. 17 indexed citations
12.
Pieh, Christoph, Peter Stippl, Antonia Barke, et al.. (2020). Psychotherapy by Telephone or Internet in Austria and Germany Which CBT Psychotherapists Rate It more Comparable to Face-to-Face Psychotherapy in Personal Contact and Have more Positive Actual Experiences Compared to Previous Expectations?. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 17(21). 7756–7756. 21 indexed citations
13.
Humer, Elke, Peter Stippl, Christoph Pieh, Rüdiger Pryss, & Thomas Probst. (2020). Experiences of Psychotherapists With Remote Psychotherapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Web-Based Survey Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 22(11). e20246–e20246. 70 indexed citations
14.
Probst, Thomas, Elke Humer, Peter Stippl, & Christoph Pieh. (2020). Being a Psychotherapist in Times of the Novel Coronavirus Disease: Stress-Level, Job Anxiety, and Fear of Coronavirus Disease Infection in More Than 1,500 Psychotherapists in Austria. Frontiers in Psychology. 11. 559100–559100. 39 indexed citations
15.
Probst, Thomas, et al.. (2020). Psychotherapists Register Impacts of the COVID-19 Lockdown on Their Patients. SSRN Electronic Journal. 5 indexed citations
16.
Probst, Thomas, Peter Stippl, & Christoph Pieh. (2020). Changes in Provision of Psychotherapy in the Early Weeks of the COVID-19 Lockdown in Austria. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 17(11). 3815–3815. 60 indexed citations
17.
Jaksch, W., Rudolf Likar, Klaus Machold, et al.. (2017). Qualitätssicherung der schmerzmedizinischen Versorgung in Österreich. Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift. 167(15-16). 349–358.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026