Peter Stecy

862 citations
9 papers · 658 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Stecy

8 papers receiving 612 citations

Peers

Peter Stecy
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 499
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 196
  • Oncology 154
  • Internal Medicine 20
  • Biophysics 29
Replace Alessandro Martinoni with:
Alessandro Martinoni Italy
Edward H. Schuster United States
Courtney L. Bickford United States
Iyad N. Daher United States
Maria Laura Canale Italy
Chiara Lestuzzi Italy
Robert A. Minow United States
Christoph Schukro Austria
Gülten Tekuzman Türkiye
Mary Kathryn Pierri United States
Peter Stecy relative to Alessandro Martinoni Italy Alessandro Martinoni's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Alessandro Martinoni · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Stecy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Stecy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Stecy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Stecy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Stecy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Stecy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Stecy. The network helps show where Peter Stecy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Stecy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Stecy Line = papers co-authored together Peter Stecy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 1988281
2 1984214
3 198981
4 200737
5 198637
6
Is intermittent dobutamine infusion useful in the treatment of patients with refractory congestive heart failure?
19906
7 19901
8
The clinical utility of transesophageal echocardiography in ischemic papillary muscle rupture.
19951
9 19880

About Peter Stecy

Peter Stecy is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 658 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (4 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (3 papers), Pericarditis and Cardiac Tamponade (2 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (2 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (2 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (1 paper), Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (1 paper) and Heart Failure Treatment and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (499 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (196 citations), Oncology (154 citations), Internal Medicine (20 citations) and Biophysics (29 citations). Peter Stecy has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Frederick Feit, Mariano Rey, Joseph J. Sanger, James L. Speyer, E Douglas Kramer, William Slater, Franco M. Muggia, Ronald H. Blum, James C. Wernz and Neil Dubin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, The American Journal of Cardiology, New England Journal of Medicine, American Heart Journal and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact