Peter Stecy

862 total citations
9 papers, 658 citations indexed

About

Peter Stecy is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Stecy has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 658 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 4 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 3 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Peter Stecy's work include Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (4 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (3 papers) and Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (2 papers). Peter Stecy is often cited by papers focused on Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (4 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (3 papers) and Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (2 papers). Peter Stecy collaborates with scholars based in United States and Poland. Peter Stecy's co-authors include Frederick Feit, Mariano Rey, Joseph J. Sanger, Anne Zeleniuch‐Jacquotte, Ronald H. Blum, William Slater, Victor J. Ferrans, Cynthia R. Ward, James L. Speyer and Neil Dubin and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and The American Journal of Cardiology.

In The Last Decade

Peter Stecy

8 papers receiving 612 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peter Stecy United States 6 499 196 182 154 100 9 658
Stephen Robb Switzerland 9 551 1.1× 162 0.8× 235 1.3× 79 0.5× 117 1.2× 15 856
Fred Senatore United States 9 388 0.8× 118 0.6× 143 0.8× 55 0.4× 34 0.3× 18 577
Iyad N. Daher United States 12 557 1.1× 228 1.2× 135 0.7× 191 1.2× 98 1.0× 21 737
Edward H. Schuster United States 11 770 1.5× 417 2.1× 356 2.0× 53 0.3× 53 0.5× 14 888
Mary T. Vooletich United States 6 522 1.0× 119 0.6× 54 0.3× 421 2.7× 103 1.0× 12 689
Kashif Kalam Australia 3 915 1.8× 430 2.2× 143 0.8× 135 0.9× 104 1.0× 4 1.0k
Michelle Bloom United States 11 501 1.0× 93 0.5× 105 0.6× 190 1.2× 95 0.9× 26 713
Christoph Schukro Austria 12 530 1.1× 98 0.5× 140 0.8× 225 1.5× 205 2.0× 42 831
Saamir Hassan United States 16 492 1.0× 201 1.0× 129 0.7× 186 1.2× 94 0.9× 57 784
Frank De Geeter Belgium 14 170 0.3× 430 2.2× 109 0.6× 79 0.5× 169 1.7× 63 740

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Stecy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Stecy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Stecy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Stecy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Stecy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Stecy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Stecy. The network helps show where Peter Stecy may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Stecy

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Stecy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Stecy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Stecy. Peter Stecy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
2.
Herrera, César J., et al.. (1995). The clinical utility of transesophageal echocardiography in ischemic papillary muscle rupture.. PubMed. 9(3). 226–8. 1 indexed citations
3.
Feit, Frederick, Warren Sherman, Mariano Rey, et al.. (1990). Right ventricular involvement in acute myocardial infarction: A report from the second MT. Sinai-Nyu reperfusion trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 15(2). A218–A218. 1 indexed citations
4.
Stecy, Peter, et al.. (1990). Is intermittent dobutamine infusion useful in the treatment of patients with refractory congestive heart failure?. PubMed. 21(1). 277–89; discussion 290. 6 indexed citations
5.
Rentrop, K.Peter, Frederick Feit, Warren Sherman, et al.. (1989). Late thrombolytic therapy preserves left ventricular function in patients with collateralized total coronary occlusion: Primary end point findings of the second mount sinai-new york university reperfusion trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 14(1). 58–64. 81 indexed citations
6.
Speyer, James L., Michael D. Green, E Douglas Kramer, et al.. (1988). Protective Effect of the Bispiperazinedione ICRF-187 against Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiac Toxicity in Women with Advanced Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 319(12). 745–752. 281 indexed citations
7.
Rosenzweig, Barry P., et al.. (1988). Systolic antegrade tricuspid blood flow—a sign of severe prosthetic valve stenosis. American Heart Journal. 115(3). 693–696.
8.
Feit, Frederick, et al.. (1986). Percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty for stenosis of a porcine bioprosthesis in the tricuspid valve position. The American Journal of Cardiology. 58(3). 363–364. 37 indexed citations
9.
Rentrop, K.Peter, Frederick Feit, Peter Stecy, et al.. (1984). Effects of Intracoronary Streptokinase and Intracoronary Nitroglycerin Infusion on Coronary Angiographic Patterns and Mortality in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction. New England Journal of Medicine. 311(23). 1457–1463. 214 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026