Peter Spáč

415 citations
51 papers · 181 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Spáč

36 papers receiving 159 citations

Peers

Peter Spáč
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Political Science and International Relations 136
  • Public Administration 16
  • Communication 15
  • Gender Studies 20
  • Sociology and Political Science 80
Replace Petr Voda with:
Petr Voda Czechia
Florian Grotz Germany
Maria Lipman Russia
Samuel Handlin United States
Arndt Leininger Germany
Olivier Rozenberg France
Jairo Nicolau Brazil
Steven B. Wolinetz Canada
Astrid Barrio Spain
Robin E. Best United States
Peter Spáč relative to Petr Voda Czechia Petr Voda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Petr Voda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Spáč

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Spáč's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Spáč with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Spáč more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Spáč

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Spáč. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Spáč. The network helps show where Peter Spáč may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Peter Spáč, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Spáč Line = papers co-authored together Peter Spáč links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201838
2
Populist Political Parties in East-Central Europe
201227
3 20209
4 20189
5 20169
6 20207
7 20147
8 20137
9 20196
10 20196
11 20215
12 20225
13
Volební mapy České a Slovenské republiky po roce 1993: vzorce,trendy, proměny
20124
14 20164
15 20213
16 20183
17 20163
18
Slovakia: Record holder in the lowest turnout
20143
19
The Role of Ballot Ranking: Preferential Voting in a Nationwide Constituency in Slovakia
20162
20 20132

About Peter Spáč

Peter Spáč is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Economics and Econometrics and Education, having authored 51 papers that have together received 181 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (13 papers), Eastern European Communism and Reforms (12 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (7 papers), Education, Psychology, and Social Research (5 papers), Local Government Finance and Decentralization (5 papers), Social Media and Politics (4 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (3 papers) and German legal, social, and political studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (136 citations), Public Administration (16 citations), Communication (15 citations), Gender Studies (20 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (80 citations). Peter Spáč has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, Slovakia and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Petr Voda, Marek Rybář, Vlastimil Havlík, Alenka Krašovec, Miloš Gregor and Andrew Roberts. Their work appears in journals such as East European Politics and Societies and Cultures, Electoral Studies, Government Information Quarterly, Problems of Post-Communism and Public Choice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact